To be fair, that critique wasnât insulting at all. Not many people on the internet even take the time to give detailed examples like that without using insults, so it was clearly an attempt at constructive criticism.
It didnât really come across as âtriggered.â In fact, examples were provided thereafter, but you claimed there were none.
Before that, instead of acknowledging any mistakes, you gave a dismissive response.
âMe when I ragebaitâ
Preferences are valid of course, but some of the corrections werenât matters of style, they were objective grammar issues. Saying âitâs just preferenceâ in those cases is deflecting rather than engaging with the actual correction.
For example, in the first sentence, the issue wasnât stylistic at all. It simply wasnât grammatically correct. You said both versions were correct and that you preferred yours, but your version removed the relative pronoun entirely. In natural, informal English, youâd typically use âwho,â while the formal version would use âwhom.â Leaving it out altogether makes the sentence read awkwardly.
The mention of having worked officially wasnât an attack, it was context to explain credibility. Turning that into âI guess that makes me worthlessâ is a strawman argument.
You said, âI accept the criticism if itâs absolutely fair,â but that clearly didnât happen here. You saw it as a waste of time, yet others actually found the feedback educational because the points were valid. Choosing not to see that is just being dismissive.
You can do better than this.
...........

Are you serious? Please don't act like the I was supposed to know that he will give actual criticism after his very first comment, to which I assumed is just a ragebait and jokingly called as such.
His very first comment was literally: "Translation doesnât flow well, grammatical errors, at least better than this other group's MTL. Get a better proofreader." Now, I'm not sure about you, but I don't see any valid criticism there, it was straight up just dismissive and condescending... it could even be said that it was an insult by framing it like we're barely better than the horrid demonic scan's version. He only added actual examples after I reacted by saying it's ragebait, but I acknowledged the examples after he gave them, so acting like I "refused criticism" ignores how the whole thing started.
About your other points:
- who/whom does create a more "formally complete" sentence, but what I meant was that in everyday natural speech, native speakers often drops the relative pronoun, so mine was more conversational. For example: "He's the guy I told you about" or "The girl I saw yesterday looked familiar"
So, no, leaving out the relative pronoun is not "wrong" automatically. I did acknowledge his correction, I just said I prefer mine over a more formally complete sentence.

In case you misunderstand again: I agree that he's right about this one, but several others were still preferences than actual errors, which you conveniently ignored again.
- The "I worked as an official editor": Please look at the order of the messages. That was after my ragebait comment, and his immediate reaction was that "Learn to take criticisms. I worked as an official editor and typesetter for over a year." (like I was supposed to know that)
Once again, I'm not sure about you, but to me it seemed like he wasn't just simply adding context for his claim, but was using that as a way to position himself above me, as if to say "Iâm qualified, you arenât, so accept what I say". But... sure, let's give him the benefit of the doubt, maybe he did just frame it bad and didn't mean any harm, and if that's the case, then I apologize.
- That "waste of time" comment wasnât about his criticism, it was about the whole situation. He felt the need to take me down a peg just because I dared to be a little proud of the work, and not sure if you noticed, but I removed my comment in case people like him (or you) tried to escalate it even further.
All in all, you can also do better than this.

I'll stop commenting, hope you guys stay happy in whatever going on with your lives.
Edit: Bro literally added a little note to talk shit before I could type my comment đwhat in the passive-aggressive. Anyway, you donât get to call someone "egocentric" just because they donât immediately grovel the moment a stranger starts with how "Translation doesnât flow well, grammatical errors, at least better than this other group's MTL. Get a better proofreader."
NO ONE would treat that as a good faith criticism on the very first read. You are literally rewriting the narrative so it frames me as an egocentric prick who dismisses any criticism, even though I just responded the way anyone would to such a condescending message. Honestly, this says a lot more about you than me.