Hey, what exactly do you mean? Are you referring to a specific line or part of the chapter?Did you guys suddenly forget how English works?
We gonna get another beriberi "epidemic"?
About 60% of the chapter would improve with a few more proofreading passes. There are incorrect pronouns and sometimes it's unclear what the person speaking is trying to say.Hey, what exactly do you mean? Are you referring to a specific line or part of the chapter?
Wait, so she's genuinely an ass? And here I thought she was just misunderstood for using blunt language.I don't think an epidemic would drive her to the point of breaking the doctor's neck.
That's a problem with the manga itself, not with me. I'm also trying to make the dialogue sound logical, since a lot of the time the wording is symbolic.About 60% of the chapter would improve with a few more proofreading passes. There are incorrect pronouns and sometimes it's unclear what the person speaking is trying to say.
Ok, since the original was called in question and I can be obnoxious and pedantic, let's look at it.That's a problem with the manga itself, not with me.

So it looks like I was right about the demons just straight up being evil. I knew the author wouldn't be anywhere near good enough to write a story where neither side was evil and neither side was good.Wait, so she's genuinely an ass? And here I thought she was just misunderstood for using blunt language.
I see your point, but I think you're treating the ambiguity in the original as if there were only one possible interpretation. I agree that "That's right!" works better than "I'm right!" in that panel, and I can see why you interpreted the second bubble that way. However, the original Japanese is ambiguous enough that the intended subject and context aren't immediately clear from the text alone.Ok, since the original was called in question and I can be obnoxious and pedantic, let's look at it.
Consider page 5, whose second panel contains a completely nonsensical dialogue. I'm not going to go page by page for brevity. I used the whole page for context, instead of just the second panel.
(You should be able to enlarge the image by clicking/tapping on it.)
View attachment 62398
When asked "is the black haired guy the saviour?", why would someone ever reply "I'm right!"? Even if you had to make sense of it because it's symbolic or whatever, since the person who answered is the black haired person in question, it'd be more logical to answer "It was me!" or, as I did, "That's right!".
The second bubble is connected to the first, which means the black haired guy is the one speaking that bubble. So, a question follows: who is "he"? And did "he" really directed the demon ("you") to deal with the plants?
The answer is that "he" and "you" are wrong. He's talking about himself teaching the other people how to handle the poison.
That panel is something that could've been caught immediately with a second pass of proofreading once the text was laid out on the page. I know Japanese lends itself perfectly well to be ambiguous, but many errors in this chapter can be fixed by looking at the drawings.
That's why you also check the drawings while translating. And when you cross-reference both, that panel in particular is 100% unambiguous and any error is 100% bad proofreading.the intended subject and context aren't immediately clear from the text alone.
Paige 5 doctor's lines make no sense.Hey, what exactly do you mean? Are you referring to a specific line or part of the chapter?
"You regain" should be "i regain", right? And there is a "was" missing before "worried". Also, typesetter seems to have a habit of splitting words across lines (without hyphen).Paige 16 old man's pronoun choice.
I don't know how it compares to the raws, but as an English sentence it reads fine as a usage of "Generic You". Gerald is making an explanation/advice-like statement, so that actually works well for a "here's an old soldier's trick" kind of tone."You regain" should be "i regain", right? And there is a "was" missing before "worried". Also, typesetter seems to have a habit of splitting words across lines (without hyphen).
@LyndoCraft
Yeah, i guess it's fine as it is, after all. Other pronounces on the page 16 seem to be fine. I guess "you forgot how English works" was kinda harsh, although i don't get why they still claim that dialog on page 5 is ambiguous if they did consider the context.I don't know how it compares to the raws, but as an English sentence it reads fine as a usage of "Generic You". Gerald is making an explanation/advice-like statement, so that actually works well for a "here's an old soldier's trick" kind of tone.