Its come up in other chapters, like the Natto couple, but did Japanese really have a aversion to bread or is it just like...Kariya?
Because he keeps bringing up rice and bread as if preferring bread makes you less spiritually Japanese which...is poppycock.
I gotta be real, in no other manga will you have intense debates that escalate wildly over US foreign policy around tariffs. Like, this is silly. why does Anne give this much of a shit about a random Japanese's guy political opinions? why are any of these people given the power to sway policy in the first place? don't they work for the cultural section of a newspaper? It's as if maureen dowd's articles held the balance over domestic policy.
but that's what makes me love it. it's so over the top and the situations are so clearly just a microphone for the mangaka's intense political opinions that it's just weirdly charming in some way.
I think the point was less about bread vs rice, more about rice being analogous to bread in that both can be seen as integral to the diets of Asian and European people respectively. People in western countries today don't necessarily eat bread everyday, but European peasants and American colonists probably did. And you can observe the same cultural significance of bread in western culture and the English language: sacramental bread, breadwinner, bread and butter, "man cannot live on bread alone" (I guess that makes the opposite point, but you get the idea). I think the author is assuming that westerners treat bread with the same reverence that Japanese people treat rice- he might have even believed that we eat bread with every meal.Its come up in other chapters, like the Natto couple, but did Japanese really have a aversion to bread or is it just like...Kariya?
Because he keeps bringing up rice and bread as if preferring bread makes you less spiritually Japanese which...is poppycock.
This is just trade protection and tariffting. I guess the author is pro tariff but I guess it makes sense. The japanese rice industry is way too frail and uncompetitive. But all that bogus about rice being the solely japanese culture is wild. Rice is grown and eaten all over east asia. Its important but nothing nationalistic
I think the point was less about bread vs rice, more about rice being analogous to bread in that both can be seen as integral to the diets of Asian and European people respectively. People in western countries today don't necessarily eat bread everyday, but European peasants and American colonists probably did. And you can observe the same cultural significance of bread in western culture and the English language: sacramental bread, breadwinner, bread and butter, "man cannot live on bread alone" (I guess that makes the opposite point, but you get the idea). I think the author is assuming that westerners treat bread with the same reverence that Japanese people treat rice- he might have even believed that we eat bread with every meal.
Incidentally, I've read a couple of other cooking manga that compare bread and rice: Hell's Kitchen Chapter 39 has two characters fight over which is better for breakfast, and Nobunaga no Chef Chapter 37 has a character compare Europeans treating bread as the flesh of Jesus to how Japanese people view rice.
It also combined with the plot of Rice Accompaniment arcThose are...fair points. Bread is deep in the core of languages.
....I DO eat alot of bread. And love a Nobunaga no chef reference. What a excellent series that was.
I did watch the OVA of this and I am curious to compare it if things were changed up, given I know how this arc ends.
Going in, I can already tell Yamaoka will be different because the anime doesnt..really lean into the slapstick and lets Yamaoka come of...kind of cool? (Helps hes voiced by Kakashi). The manga very much does not.
That and in the respective scene, the Tsuchida guy is wearing regular clothes and not ceremonial japaneae stuff, because...I think th OVA doesnt make the scene a new years thing..but my memory IS fuzzy on it. Doesnt change much, but it IS a change.