Itsudemo Jitaku ni Kaereru Ore wa, Isekai de Gyoushounin wo Hajimemashita - Ch. 72

[Grikath]

Boo. ff'in'. Hoo.

Seriously author-san... you're going with this ? 🤢

 

[maffo666]

These comments lol. Is killing an ant murder?

An ant, clearly no, not even morally. If an ant chooses to spite you can it do anything to seriously affect you?
A bigger animal could stand a chance at harming you, but you avoided the argument that would cause people to think pets.
A whole colony of ants, maybe. A dog or cat, probably.

 

[Fantasie841]

Why didn't she simply take her sister out of the land where everything is a deadly poison?

Like, there is nothing at all preventing her from traveling to other places, is there? Even if her sister is too weak too move, which doesn't seem to be the case, why not take normal food and bring it to her?

Even if you take it at face value and ignore all the other bad stuff she did, this backstory motivation is still complete nonsense.

 

[finalm]

Someone else manipulating her doesn't absolve her of her own culpability nor does it justify actions she voluntarily took. If I tell you there is gold hidden inside the head of bald men I'm lying to you and manipulating you. It however doesn't absolve you of the guilt and responsibility for what you do with that false information, especially if you go around with a pick axe attempting to find that gold and using violence on anyone trying to stop you.

Who are you even arguing with, bro? Did I even mention something like absolution or non-culpability? This is why I told the previous guy to read what wrote again, slowly. Unfortunately, I have to repeat the same to you and all the other guys who only see red the moment a course of action that they don't like is suggested. Of course, I'm assumming that is the issue here, rather than just reading comprehension itself, as a show of good will.

 

[win746]

cool motive, still (attempted) murder

 

[TenThousandWaspsInACoat]

Who are you even arguing with, bro? Did I even mention something like absolution or non-culpability? This is why I told the previous guy to read what wrote again, slowly. Unfortunately, I have to repeat the same to you and all the other guys who only see red the moment a course of action that they don't like is suggested. Of course, I'm assumming that is the issue here, rather than just reading comprehension itself, as a show of good will.

You're not making much of an argument, you're throwing out wild accusations and attempting to slander anyone who disagrees with you in the most blatant way.

Accusing others of "seeing red" because they disagree with you is in itself hilarious and projection. Folks rightfully reject your notion that a sob story and some cheap excuses justify horrific atrocities, selfishness, and violent murder. And at the end of the day there's only really two ways this is going to go. She's either going to be forgiven with no real consequences, or she's held accountable for her crimes and dealt with.

Oh, and using the most bog standard pseudo intellectual insults to try and denigrate other people's intelligence and ability to parse your angry early twenties rants because "otherwise they couldn't possibly disagree with you", does absolutely nothing for anyone taking you serious. You come off as smarmy, overly aggressive, and unjustifiedly arrogant instead. Calm down, take a deep breath, and try to be reasonable for once. Thanks!

 

[TenThousandWaspsInACoat]

These comments lol. Is killing an ant murder?

Who is supposed to be the ant in your example. Or are you trying to imply that "might make right" and thus killing people weaker than you is entirely fine and justified if they are in the way of what you want? Because if we follow that kind of logic to it's inevitable conclusion, then killing her right now isn't murder either. Becaue she's not the weaker party and at their mercy and killing her ensures the safety and prosperity of many others.

 

[finalm]

You're not making much of an argument, you're throwing out wild accusations and attempting to slander anyone who disagrees with you in the most blatant way.

Wild accusations, slander? Like pointing out you didn't understand my comment, argued with things that weren't said and now refuse to admit being mistaken? This is a line I'd expect of a sleazy politician and frankly I'm disgusted with those, so either quit it or get ready to be dismissed, casually.

Accusing others of "seeing red" because they disagree with you is in itself hilarious and projection. Folks rightfully reject your notion that a sob story and some cheap excuses justify horrific atrocities, selfishness, and violent murder. And at the end of the day there's only really two ways this is going to go. She's either going to be forgiven with no real consequences, or she's held accountable for her crimes and dealt with.

What else am I to assume, when I clearly told you that is not my notion and still you don't get it? The abysmal reading comprehension option? Suit yourself then.

Oh, and using the most bog standard pseudo intellectual insults to try and denigrate other people's intelligence and ability to parse your angry early twenties rants because "otherwise they couldn't possibly disagree with you", does absolutely nothing for anyone taking you serious. You come off as smarmy, overly aggressive, and unjustifiedly arrogant instead. Calm down, take a deep breath, and try to be reasonable for once. Thanks!

Bro, you are once again fighting a strawman of your own creation. I didn't say any of those things you supposedly quote me on. Are you that desperate to score points here? And with that still you have the gall to accuse me of being overly agressive? Not to mention arrogant, since still you double down on nonsense, after ignoring being specifically told to re-read what you're responding to. I don't know what vile environment taught you such "methods" of communication, but I've no patience for those. Again, stop that or gtfo.

 

[Echion]

the way they describe that northern island is kinda comically over the top. there are demons, zombies, and all kinds of monsters running rampage, you either get killed or enslaved, nothing grows, oh and what does grow is POISONOUS. I think the population would just tend to die out in a place like that...

 

[bot]

the way they describe that northern island is kinda comically over the top. there are demons, zombies, and all kinds of monsters running rampage, you either get killed or enslaved, nothing grows, oh and what does grow is POISONOUS. I think the population would just tend to die out in a place like that...

did they try to make isekai australlia?

 

[kaikalaila]

Time for the return to peddling? Peddle some needed modern medicine??

 

[jvlg]

"Please MC, have mercy! All the villain wants is to eat a baby! *
Isn't that sad and relatable?"
Not really helping her case here.
* Ok fine, feed a baby to someone else, but still

 

[breakthelimit]

it was so-so story based on the title until the sisters’ debut.

 

[Shori948]

I'll at least wait until the next chapter. If he actually forgive her, I'm dropping this series right away.

 

[Pennygrey44]

2 points

1. I find it kind of funny that even the grandma seems to ignore the sisters, like the only one she acknowledged so far was MC. I mean it could be situational, but still seems like she didn't even notice them.

2. Human kill things all the time that science has shown to be intelligent for "reasons", so I am not going to hold it against the demon lady, and she has shown herself to be decent with shirou prior to knowing of the dragon, so its somewhat believable, but like others have said, there is no way the sister is still alive given from the flashback a decent amount of time has to have passed. But at the same time I feel like this manga has been relatively non-serious so maybe she is alive? Any novel spoilers?

 

[ddulz]

Yeah, probably her sister is long gone, like nobody even fed her, and this info is sus anyway.