Search results

For context, I believe the root cause for this is Chrome wanting to autofill previous inputs, the system works as expected on Firefox for example. This may or may not be fixed later today, Chrome is pretty weird and invasive about this stuff.

Thanks, fixed.

@kenx Technically this is not a bug, since just like you alluded to this is expected behaviour. Whether this should be the excpected behaviour is a separate matter, but since (I'm pretty sure) even guest views are counted, I'm not sure it really matters. If someone wants to for some bizarre...

Chief, this is not epic

s n i p p e d

While this is something that probably should be fixed, you can just click the link and find out.

@jokerxhisoka That's true if the characters don't think of whatever is happening as supernatural, yeah.

@Barclayss Oh, man. That menulist addition was supposed to be a bit of a hack to make selects at least readable on some mobile Safari browsers while using the Dark theme, because for whatever reason they would ignore background-color, making the lists appear with white text on light gray...

By that definition, everything that is natural is simultaneously also supernatural. I completely reject that definition, it makes no sense. If supernatural = natural + other things, what are the other things called? Although it would be funny that I could eat homegrown, supernatural food

It's not an extension either. It's by definition "things that exist outside of the natural realm". If something is natural, it cannot be supernatural and vice versa. They're mutually exclusive. e: Although to be fair I have absolutely no idea of what "supernatural things" would even be in the...

What? Supernatural is by definition not part of the natural, otherwise it would be called natural. Supernatural is not a subcategory of the natural, obviously.

@reeverdark Yeah, something like is what's essentially what's being done for example with latest updates (although I'm not sure it's being used as effectively as possible right now). If we were to implement this, that kind of a pattern is what would we use, although the problem here is that it...

The results are correct, the pagination is bugged. The reason you're only seeing so few is because the tag is new.

You have to be following them.

@Narf Just like @ununseti said, I was talking about the publishing status. The only data we track about that is the final volume and chapter numbers. If we're talking about sorting by the amount of chapters uploaded to the site, technically we could calculate and sort manga based on that...

While technically true, the demographic "genres" were deprecated and discouraged from being used months ago in favor of the separate Demographic setting. Their search results haven't been accurate ever since. I agree that finetuning the Demographic option similarly to how the tags work now...

Don't be sorry about it, I wouldn't have changed it if I thought it was the wrong thing to do I'm not mad at you at all lol, I didn't mean to give that impression

Added an any/all option to both tag inclusion and exclusion You're complaining about a change that never happened to begin with

@Askun I cannot for the life of me understand how on earth it makes any sense that an up arrow means descending and a down arrow means ascending, but since the FontAwesome icons that we use do it like that too, I guess I have no choice Flipped the sort dropdown arrows around

@marcelc63 Sorry, but we don't keep track of that information.