Wait, there were people who got incensed that Naofumi had their names changed to shameful epithets that weren't also angry that he didn't have them put to death like they were supposed to be?What the manga presented as a perfectly ethnically valid payback? Don't even get me started.
First, one does not preclude the other.Wait, there were people who got incensed that Naofumi had their names changed to shameful epithets that weren't also angry that he didn't have them put to death like they were supposed to be?
Yeah, the protag's pickup lines are the opposite of useful, and very well validate the girl's concerns.Yeah nah saying that ur "a little excited" to a girl hiding from abuse by being in ur house is not the right way to go about it tbh lmao..
her mom striped her naked and beat the sh!t out of her. Doubt she will cry over it after so long.I wouldn't be surprise if she's going to have traumatic nightmares while also crying in her sleep; just to show how mentally and emotionally affected she is by the abuse.
My point is that the most irritation I saw from readers was with Naofumi choosing to not kill them.First, one does not preclude the other.
If you're talking about the slave crests, those were used to force them into telling the truth under penalty of death by the force of the crests. They didn't "affect the mind"-- the pain was physical.Second, it's not "changed their names" but also "had them enslaved through mind-affecting magic".
Are you referencing something that happens in the LN that has yet to be adapted in anime or manga?The problem, again, is entirely in the manga depicting this kind of "eye-for-an-eye, no matter how ugly it gets" behaviour as just and morally justified.
If she developed a psychological trauma from the abuse (not saying that she did, only if), then yeah her crying and/or having nightmares in her sleep is very much possible regardless of duration.her mom striped her naked and beat the sh!t out of her. Doubt she will cry over it after so long.
I might be misremembering. So then it's simply torture, not mind control? Much better, changes everything, really.If you're talking about the slave crests, those were used to force them into telling the truth under penalty of death by the force of the crests. They didn't "affect the mind"-- the pain was physical.
Aha, he rejects his impulse for vengeance by taking his vengeance in full, all the while inventing novel ways to humiliate, mock and denigrate those who have wronged him instead of seeking actual justice through proper legal procedure.Not even the premise of that statement is correct-- it's antithetical to Naofumi's character, because the point of the first arc (and part of his general character, really) is that he rejects the impulse for vengeance despite having been wronged.
They're using it as a lie detector, partly because at least one of the tried parties is a pathological liar (that still tries to, fully knowing the consequences).So then it's simply torture,
...no.Aha, he rejects his impulse for vengeance by taking his vengeance in full, all the while inventing novel ways to humiliate, mock and denigrate those who have wronged him instead of seeking actual justice through proper legal procedure.
The character in question himself did it so that the queen does not have to sentence her child to death. Since he is one of the wronged parties, it can be justified that his suggestion of the punishment should be taken into account so that the queen does not have to impartially judge them as would be expected of her.he rejects his impulse for vengeance by taking his vengeance in full, all the while inventing novel ways to humiliate, mock and denigrate those who have wronged him
What are you talking about? The punishment was approved by the literal queen of the country. How much more legal can it even get than approval of the reigning monarch?instead of seeking actual justice through proper legal procedure
No matter how unruly or rebelious child you are I don't think anyone deserves sexual abuse by a family member.I'm beginning to believe she deserved it
You put way too much thought into it. Women are seen as weak and pure, they must be protected! Men are seen as beast that want to dominate and defile women. In actuality both sexes have their fair share of shitty, abusive, explotitave people. Being a bad person knows no gender.Creepiness factor is different between genders simply for biological reasons: as long as pregnancy and giving birth will remain massive investments of resources for women, affecting their lives for years, men will be the ones normatively seeking relationships and thus men will be the ones seen as creeps for showing attention inappropriately.
...they're pseudomedieval imbeciles who do not know that torture is not a lie-detecting tool. Shield was isekaid, though, so he knows better.They're using it as a lie detector, partly because
I don't think bickering back and forth "this is not what happens" - "totally is" is something we should do. Fact remains that as a result of his actions, the parties who wronged him got a cruel and unusual punishment, which is presented by the manga as totally a-okay since, you know, the poor baby had been wronged.That's actually not at all what happens, and now I'm concerned about whether we're talking about two different series.
A single person taking arbitrary legal decisions without competitive court process cannot by definition be anything but a kangaroo court. Again, pseudomedieval imbeciles might not know better, Shield does, yet he gladly uses the system to exact his vengeance instead of changing it.Branding his offenders with new names was a privilege given to him by the "proper legal procedure" after his vindication in a non-kangaroo court he could have never gotten on his own, and it was something he personally decided as an alternative to the torture and/or double execution that was recommended to him by that legal process.
Yep, which is a reflection of the same biological mechanism, one that demands society to allow men to compete for attention of women, while as much as possible minimizing the harm caused in the process.You put way too much thought into it. Women are seen as weak and pure, they must be protected! Men are seen as beast that want to dominate and defile women.
Goes without saying. But since men are on average stronger, faster, more used to conflict and tolerating pain caused by it, they tend to be abusers much more often (as well as, btw, victims - about 75% of violent crime victims are male, again see above about biological nature of social norms).In actuality both sexes have their fair share of shitty, abusive, explotitave people. Being a bad person knows no gender.
It is, when the torture is at the behest of a magic tattoo that will only ever torture when you're lying....they're pseudomedieval imbeciles who do not know that torture is not a lie-detecting tool.
"We shouldn't discuss what actually happened-- instead, you should just allow me to dictate what actually happened, even as I'm fabricating details!"I don't think bickering back and forth "this is not what happens" - "totally is" is something we should do. Fact remains that--
In lieu of someone having to have her own husband and daughter executed for summoning all four Cardinal Heroes behind her back and causing an international power imbalance on account of each country having already agreed to summon only one of the four heroes, framing one of said heroes of capital crimes (rape, raping a royal), and attempting to execute the heiress apparent.Fact remains that as a result of his actions, the parties who wronged him got a cruel and unusual punishment
They got point blank proof of the crimes committed. Your argument hinges on the lie detecting slave crest not being definitively and demonstrably accurate.A single person taking arbitrary legal decisions without competitive court process