In other words, everyone not of low status (those with mediocre and high statuses) can never achieve success?"What do you think is absolutely necessary in order to achieve success?
The answer, Cronin, is to be of low status."
I can see why you'd think that with what he's saying, but it's not what he's really getting at. It's summed up in his "a giant can't be a giant-killer" line, obviously a giant can kill giants and technically be a giant-killer, but he wouldn't be sung of as one. The only ones who get called giant-killers are those who are thought of as being "beneath" giants, who it's an impressive feat for. The same is the case with him saying "a soldier killing a large beast is impressive, but a general killing a herd of them is just them doing their job", despite killing a herd being strictly a more impressive feat.In other words, everyone not of low status (those with mediocre and high statuses) can never achieve success?
Both shining knight and the General look like good candidates for the sword. One is the berserk and the other would probably do anything for glory and to stand above those that use him.
But the Prince looks like the mastermind kind that would agree to the peace treaty with Ivelle and use both her and Mirio for his own goals.
I know what you mean. But then he should have said that differently. Maybe something like, "What do you think is absolutely necessary in order for others to see you as someone who have achieved something great? The answer, Cronin, is to be someone who was first perceived as lacking."I can see why you'd think that with what he's saying, but it's not what he's really getting at. It's summed up in his "a giant can't be a giant-killer" line, obviously a giant can kill giants and technically be a giant-killer, but he wouldn't be sung of as one. The only ones who get called giant-killers are those who are thought of as being "beneath" giants, who it's an impressive feat for. The same is the case with him saying "a soldier killing a large beast is impressive, but a general killing a herd of them is just them doing their job", despite killing a herd being strictly a more impressive feat.
His point isn't that those of high status can never be successful at doing things, but that when they do, it won't be seen as "greatness", but just "what's expected".
Could be, but also if I'm right in him currently hiding his own ability, rather than a TL thing it could also just be a weirdness of philosophy of his, where he equates success with stand-out fame, and not the raw fruits of one's labor (where he could either be hiding now to reveal it later, or he believes that it stands out more to have an army saved by a mysterious knight than just having an army with a competent general). Who knows without looking at the raws, though.I know what you mean. But then he should have said that differently. Maybe something like, "What do you think is absolutely necessary in order for others to see you as someone who have achieved something great? The answer, Cronin, is to be someone who was first perceived as lacking."
Then again, maybe the problem lies on the wordings used by the translators.
Yeah, I also think that's what he's doing. It's just that the wordings he used was... weird. That's why I think that maybe the translator did a mistake. Or maybe the author.Could be, but also if I'm right in him currently hiding his own ability, rather than a TL thing it could also just be a weirdness of philosophy of his, where he equates success with stand-out fame, and not the raw fruits of one's labor (where he could either be hiding now to reveal it later, or he believes that it stands out more to have an army saved by a mysterious knight than just having an army with a competent general). Who knows without looking at the raws, though.
That's not even a good point. It's an unbelievably bad reading of history. Look through any listing of men called "the Great" and see how many were already some kind of aristocrat or chief. The vast majority of historical figures came from some kind of privileged background because the easiest way to acquire power is to already have some power. Alexander the Great was already the prince of a regional power. Genghis Khan was born into the ruling family of a powerful steppe clan. Oda Nobunaga was the scion of a regionally significant clan. Even more humble men like Napoleon were born into comfortable households descended from minor nobility. There aren't a whole lot of men who were born into dirt and famine, and carved their name into history regardless, throughout the millennia. It's hard to be the best when you're stunted and illiterate. That observation only makes sense if this guy literally just reads fictional epics instead of history.His point isn't that those of high status can never be successful at doing things, but that when they do, it won't be seen as "greatness", but just "what's expected".
Agreed. What the prince seems to be saying is that "success", in the public imagination, is measured in relation to one's initial station. While the serf who rises to become a prosperous businessman is lauded as a great success, the king who becomes a petit bourgeois shop owner is considered a failure.Yeah, I also think that's what he's doing. It's just that the wordings he used was... weird. That's why I think that maybe the translator did a mistake. Or maybe the author.