Active member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2019
- Messages
- 12
@Ace435
So you're saying North Korean defectors who turn on their country are shitty people if the NK government decides to massacre their family line? Bullshit. When a government's laws violate human rights, those who disobey such laws are not morally responsible for the actions of the unjust government, especially if the government resorts to collective punishment. Running away from a kidnapper who decides to murder 10 hostages for your refusal to cooperate doesn't make you responsible in any way for the hostages deaths. A princess who refuses a political marriage isn't responsible if her refusal to marry causes an emperor to enslave or genocide her entire kingdom. None of the victims of an unjust government have any right to be angry at somebody refusing to sacrifice themselves.
All of you shitting on the brother are delusional. There's nothing morally wrong with conscientious objection to conscription.
So you're saying North Korean defectors who turn on their country are shitty people if the NK government decides to massacre their family line? Bullshit. When a government's laws violate human rights, those who disobey such laws are not morally responsible for the actions of the unjust government, especially if the government resorts to collective punishment. Running away from a kidnapper who decides to murder 10 hostages for your refusal to cooperate doesn't make you responsible in any way for the hostages deaths. A princess who refuses a political marriage isn't responsible if her refusal to marry causes an emperor to enslave or genocide her entire kingdom. None of the victims of an unjust government have any right to be angry at somebody refusing to sacrifice themselves.
All of you shitting on the brother are delusional. There's nothing morally wrong with conscientious objection to conscription.