Says the guy who's misusing you're and your on the last line + tried and fail at using a big word (it's vacillate, single c, 2 l)
And seemingly miss my first post on why I think using they would be the wrong choice of word earlier.
Truly, someone with an opinion worth giving a shite about. /s
That's an autocorrect issue, as opposed to naturally dropping definitive articles, and not knowing past tense... and if you seriously think vacillate constitutes a "big word," then I've got some really unfortunate news for you, bruh...
I'm just saying that it is hypocrisy in fullness to think to lecture both myself and another person on the use of pronouns when you yourself are plainly unclear on the basics of the language involved... and your mind-numbingly boorish reply simply illustrates this.
The very concerning part is that, from all of your comments, you seem to think that, even though you have less knowledge than others discussing this topic, you have the right and ability to educate them... when you yourself don't actually understand it.
In colloquial English, that's called the "Dunning–Kruger effect," and you should definitely learn about it; it may seem like an attack on your culture, depending upon national origin, but it's not meant to be.
(I am aware that some countries value ignorance, arrogance, and using any force available to force others into agreements that are false and/or contrary to reality, and I'm not trying to attack people based on that... even if it is stupid, shitty, and worthy of being removed from our planet. Based on your words and interactions here, I can see how that might feel personal, but I promise it isn't, at all)
It's a very... muscovite attitude (just as an example) to be 100% incorrect, and while being incorrect, believe that they simply have to tear down other people for their incorrect information to be viewed as accurate. Other hallmarks, such as missing verb tenses, dropping definitive articles, and arguing over pronouns that are used both colloquially and formally in the English language; then followed up with ad hominem, affirmations of the consequent, and subtle linguistic assumptions of one's own certitude without evidentiary support are all quite common, and you were plainly doing that, so... it seemed similar, yanno? I'm not claiming to "know" or anything; it's simply quite similar.
If you're not keeping up (which is fine) I was just pointing out how utterly ignorant and childish your comments have been. I understand if you're not following, though; actual discussions might be hard for you.
Good luck on your further education! Definitely take the time for it, as your skills with regards to introspection seem to need some development.
Oh, and sorry if I used too many... what did you call them? Ah, that's right: "big words." Sorry if I used too many big words; do your best, kiddo!