And that was why I added the example of someone initially agreeing to something, but then revoking their consent. Remember, you can always say "no", and all they can do is throw you out and call the cops on you (because taking peep-shots isn't legal either. And the cops can do any kinds of illegal shit they want if they have somethingsomething-suspicion of a crime, even if there might be some red tape for them to cut first. So don't use this to actually take any).
ps: eula's aren't legally binding in most contexts. though that's another discussion, and has mostly to do with dark patterns and them trying to overreach (if it is written/'hidden' in such a way you expect most to not read it, made it possible to "agree" way too easily and without even requiring the user to have opened it (checkbox/button to accept instead of signature or bankID to digitally sign it; link to the eula in another page), and/or have terms that can not naively be expected by someone simply accepting it... well good luck taking them to court in this country for breaking it 
You might have a chance though if the terms are implicit things expected through the nature of the product/transaction). But so long as all you do is 'throw them out', that should work if there wasn't some implicit contractual obligation on your service's side when they signed up for it (ie. large marketing shenanigans the user likely saw that contradict your ToS they likely didn't see).
Although maybe japan and/or america are different.
You might have a chance though if the terms are implicit things expected through the nature of the product/transaction). But so long as all you do is 'throw them out', that should work if there wasn't some implicit contractual obligation on your service's side when they signed up for it (ie. large marketing shenanigans the user likely saw that contradict your ToS they likely didn't see).Although maybe japan and/or america are different.
It was implied they deleted or confiscated the data though. Hence why my analogy broke the physical objects.
don't worry about replying
Rather, I always(tm) like discussions, so rather thanks for the addition And what you are referring to is suspension of disbeliefs and tropes/plot devices such as "rule of cool". Doesn't stop me or others from having fun calling things out that wouldn't fly IRL if ppl knew their rights. Because having nonsensical fun is fun
(same reason I don't mind spouting stuff like the above despite knowing things differ wildly by country - even neighbouring ones).Reminds me of that manga that recently had a chapter where the elf girl kissed the sleeping male lead, and everyone called her out for the sexual assault that it was
