Drawing - Saikyou Mangaka wa Oekaki Skill de Isekai Musou Suru! - Vol. 1 Ch. 1 - Reset
- Thread starter MangaDex
- Start date
From the way you word it... you probably aren't a true milf lover.
You should call her legal loli. Fits your tastes more.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2023
- Messages
- 740
The dragon kinda reminds me of Haxorus
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2019
- Messages
- 2,238
I'm afraid you are the one that isn't a true MILF lover. Seems like you just like ladies with big tits and have lost the true meaning of the word. True MILFs are Mothers You'd Like to Fuck. And I go for mothers with flat chests.
MILF has nothing to do with body type of breast size. It's how you feel towards a specific mother. (That isn't your own, obviously.)
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2024
- Messages
- 429
I think MC understimated his parents.
They are a commoner family that owns a potion shops... ACTUALLY, I would say thats a very lucrative business on that kind of fantasy world. Also, in that semi-flashback about the Mc's new mother and father meeting each other it seems like they used to be adventurers or something. So maybe they werent complete nobodies as MC believes
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2024
- Messages
- 804
Everyone's super mad about the writing but I just want to see more of the big titty elf lady
"Akira Rainford" 
"My name's Diva, it means 'goddess' in Latin, and your dad's name, Carl, means 'free man of low birth' in Old Norse. Those are languages of people that invaded, mingled and influenced our land and culture. I named you 'Akira', a word from a culture we've got no ties with whatsoever, or even knowledge, and just sounds like gibberish to people around you, because the author couldn't bother to find an culturally appropriate unisex name, like Dominic or Claude, and went for the most generic japanese one."
"My name's Diva, it means 'goddess' in Latin, and your dad's name, Carl, means 'free man of low birth' in Old Norse. Those are languages of people that invaded, mingled and influenced our land and culture. I named you 'Akira', a word from a culture we've got no ties with whatsoever, or even knowledge, and just sounds like gibberish to people around you, because the author couldn't bother to find an culturally appropriate unisex name, like Dominic or Claude, and went for the most generic japanese one."
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2023
- Messages
- 1,828
Disregarding all this bullshit in the comments abt the maid, DO YOU KNOW HOW COOL IT WOULD BE IF YOU COULD DRAW WELL AND DRAW WHATEVER YOU LIKE TO EXISTENCE, fucking GODZILLA and shit bro just as your pets or like just cool movie vehicles like a yautja air ship
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2021
- Messages
- 874
Jeez, fuck this guy. Just blessed on earth and now able to pick whichever hot milf with a slutty body he wanted. This is ridiculous.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2018
- Messages
- 648
Wrong. It's Mother I'd Like to Fuck MILF. It's not a body type. If she's a mom, and you wanna fuck her, she's a MILF.
Objection!
Furthermore, he got a "chose which breasts you get to suck milk from" prompt. Though sadly, a baby won't actually appreciate it.
No, that's literally the most realistic thing happening, hands down. He's literally a child again. I don't care if he has a previous life's memories. He does NOT have his previous life's brain. It wouldn't even fit into his current skull, as-is.
A brain is a complex bio-chemical computer. Memories or not, he has child's far less developed brain, that operates exactly as you'd expect a child's brain to operate. What you seem to expect is far less realistic than any magic system in any series written.
Now being stupid (even for his age or not), that's another question. Having read only chapter 1, I'll see. It didn't seem like he truly had a well rounded adult life either, in a very different world, so I don't expect his experiences to be very useful in this one.
Power Uploader
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
- Messages
- 1,918
I don't know why you would respond to an almost 3 year old comment trying to argue about such a small detail, maybe to engage in a conversation about science? But your lack of willingness to accept a different opinion ("I don't care if he has previous life's memories) and being snarky in general, it makes me think that you just wanted to larp as a smart person on a three year old thread. But since I'm actually educated on Neuroscience (and was kind of in the mood of writing) so I will play.
Your argument that an adult brain wouldn't fit into his current skull is right, that is if you're going on the basis on pure science and the assumption that the brain works like an SD card where you copy just the memories and paste it onto another brain. Since you want strict science, so let's stick to it, right?
Memories are physical patterns, not separate data files. You cannot transfer the memory of an adult without physically recreating the exact neural configuration that encodes it. That configuration includes not just a single isolated engram, but the whole associative network that gives the memory context and meaning, which includes connections to emotional centers like the amygdala, and to the prefrontal areas that help you reflect on it. So if you magically imprinted episodic memories of an adult onto a child’s brain, you would necessarily be rewiring large portions of that brain to resemble the adult brain’s connectivity. The distinction between memories and the brain collapses.
You talk as if his previous life's memories are a lightweight possession separate from the brain. You are trying to have it both ways. He has his adult memories, but he is also a child in the PFC. Of course, this magical and dualistic splitting of the mind and body that neuroscience DEFINITELY doesn't permit, is not unrealistic at all! What's more unrealistic is expecting some degree of adult emotional expression and the presence of mature synaptic patterns, especially between prefrontal and limbic areas, giving him faster emotional recovery after outbursts, conscious access to coping strengths and a higher baseline of self-awareness. Now THAT is so unrealistic! (your words, not mine)
If you want to be a 100% strict and nitpicky about the biology, then the whole argument is gone. If you want to be 50% nitpicky, the whole argument is gone again, because we already discovered how the brain works, congratulations on that part. And if you want to be 10% nitpicky, and cherry pick the Science that conveniently only helps your argument, then yeah you would be right.
So which one is more unrealistic?
If we want to strictly go on the path of realism, it's more realistic to be able to accept that somehow his fully adult brain was transferred to his reincarnated body, through some rare case of biological miracle. You're trying to sound sooo scientifically rigorous when your argument is the least realistic, medically outrageous, and philosophically incompatible with modern cognitive science.
Since we can't cherry pick Science because that will only prop up one side of the argument. And we can't be fully strict on it as well because that makes the whole argument bullshit. The only option is to argue about which one is more realistic.
A scenario where he carries the adult brain. Physically impossible in practice but conceptually coherent with materialism. The mind is the brain, so move the brain, move the mind.
Your scenario, which requires memories to exist as separable, non-physical information. It's also impossible, in a different and deeper way, because it violates the fundamental principle of neuroscience that mind and brain are not separate substances. Your scenario is conceptually impossible even as a thought experiment without resorting to dualism. It contradicts how we know brains encode anything.
You're rejecting the scenario in which he has an adult brain, calling it insanely unrealistic (which is true, but irrelevant because I never argued for a literal brain transplant) BUT SIMULTANEOUSLY insisting that the scenario which you're arguing in favor of is what's happening, and then using biological realism to demand 100% child-like emotional behavior. Your scenario is already a magical, non-biological premise. You don’t get to smuggle in a miracle "memories without physical brain changes!" and then draw hard biological boundaries around everything else as if no miracle occurred. It's like saying "I accept that a wizard turned him into a frog, but because he’s a frog he must only eat flies. There is no way he retains his human taste for pizza!"
Once the fundamental rules are broken, you can’t selectively invoke them to prohibit related consequences.
And that my friend, is the:
Special Pleading Fallacy
Have a great day.
Last edited:
Only chapter 1 and I'm already seeing bullshit. Like just forgetting everything else, the whole Aria thing was complete bullshit I'm sorry. First of all why does the maid have more say then the parents? No? Alright whatever. Second why was he putting up with it if he hated it? Just say no. Let her do her worst. So in the MC's eyes Aria was just hating on him because she was jealous of his mother. Right? So he grew to not like her. Which to be fair it's validated. She might've just been strict, because for her it was tough love. But looking at it from his point of view that was just being abusive. And I'm siding with him. Like would it hurt you to be gentle a bit? Like most 7 year olds would look at that and think she's just mean and hating. Then she's about to die and says the magic words, "run, save yourself!" And all of a sudden it's all good. The MC just suddenly understood that it was just her being strict and all that. Like oh, my bad Aria. I didn't know. I understand now, it's all good. Like what the fuck? Hate doesn't work that way my boy. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he should've saved her. I'm saying it felt like they made the reason to save her, having the MC being cool with her.
Similar threads
