I frowned with that interaction between wolf and doberman. Wolf with holier-than-thou speech kills the dog on basis that the dog chose wrong and is irredeemable because it eats human flesh and muscle....did the author choose this because of some weird relationship people have in the east with dogs, cuz really? That whole scene is terrible.
Not sure how much common knowledge this is, but...for one, dogs wouldn't choose to eat human. Carnivores don't eat high level carnivores because of how tainted the meat is....unless, say, they're in the desert and have no choice. The higher up the food chain you go the more poisoned/unhealthy the meat is (eg dolphin/shark meat is really bad for your health because of the mercury content accumulation from all the sub levels of the food chain they eat). it would have been trained to eat human meat, so that fatass is really to blame. Three....if it was some shmuck saying this to the dog, could overlook it, but the "king of animals"? He would know better. I.e., the knowledge the author has given the wolf man is false and cheapens his character background.
That sort of dialogue and action is an example that just shows the level of the author's ignorance, which ends up making for a poorly executed story and characters....
But am i still reading? Yes for now. I don't really enjoy it right now but I'm holding onto hope that the author is learning a lot as they write this and will improve. There are elements there that I like, but wish for them to be executed much better to be able to fully enjoy them.