Active member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2019
- Messages
- 492
Poorly formatted walls of text are difficult for anyone to understand champ. That's why paragraph's are a thing. But its quite kind of you to graciously use the most basic level of proper formatting. I've zero interest in convincing you of anything and you rehashing your previously mentioned points isn't going to convince anyone either. So we'll have to agree to disagree. Or if you prefer a point by point brief resposne.
1) You clearly aren't familiar with the term gatekeeping.
2) What logic? Why go on to give your personal definition of informed? Did you perhaps mean vocabulary?
3) We can imagine whatever you want. I stated my opinion based on the text in question. You disagree, that's cool. But your two paragraphs of "lets imagine" isn't changing my mind. The trigger was unconvincing.
6.5) Again you misunderstand basic English. I was clearly and explicitly referring to what the story had currently become, not the text in its entirety.
I suppose, in conclusion, you completely misread and misunderstood my post and wrote your little article railing against points I never made. Which means you're either being deliberately obtuse or didn't grasp simple points made in a simple manner (or perhaps I made them poorly, perish the thought). Finally "You come across as weak"? Discussing ones opinion of a middle of the road webcomic? What a mental thing to say. Either way, I'll agree to disagree and stick you on ignore so save yourself the hassle of rehashing your points yet again.
Oh god, will people think I'm "weak" now? How will I live with the shame? Well if I was the main character in this I guess I'd have a sudden shift to sociopathy.
1) You clearly aren't familiar with the term gatekeeping.
2) What logic? Why go on to give your personal definition of informed? Did you perhaps mean vocabulary?
3) We can imagine whatever you want. I stated my opinion based on the text in question. You disagree, that's cool. But your two paragraphs of "lets imagine" isn't changing my mind. The trigger was unconvincing.
4) Yes, sudden. As I said there was growing evidence of change but the actual change was sudden thats why you have the radical change in his behaviour. You are aware what sudden means right?
5) A passing reference to her feeling like his mother once is arguably not "clearly stated." Her behaviour in 71 was also in line with her previous behaviour. It was, again, unconvincing as a trigger.
6) It's amusing how you keep accusing me of being ignorant while constantly failing to understand basic English. Firstly, you're confusing a characters backstory for depth. Depth of character has more to do with how a character is realised not their sad backstory. Further I was specifically talking about her wild phase, the clue was that I specifically mentioned it. She was a mindless berserker at that point, her entire "character" consisted of "revenge". There was no nuance to her in that period. Similarly "Wild Jitae" is equally one-dimensional. You keep on talking about people not understanding the manga or the characters as if there's some great depth to the story or characters, at its best its a shallow revenge story, nobody is confused about anything thats happening here. Well I mean you seem to be confused, but not about the comic at least. I mean "You haven't read it!" is a ludicrous response. Unless I guessed really well my previous post alone would be evidence I had. You seem very threatened by people disagreeing with you.
5) A passing reference to her feeling like his mother once is arguably not "clearly stated." Her behaviour in 71 was also in line with her previous behaviour. It was, again, unconvincing as a trigger.
6) It's amusing how you keep accusing me of being ignorant while constantly failing to understand basic English. Firstly, you're confusing a characters backstory for depth. Depth of character has more to do with how a character is realised not their sad backstory. Further I was specifically talking about her wild phase, the clue was that I specifically mentioned it. She was a mindless berserker at that point, her entire "character" consisted of "revenge". There was no nuance to her in that period. Similarly "Wild Jitae" is equally one-dimensional. You keep on talking about people not understanding the manga or the characters as if there's some great depth to the story or characters, at its best its a shallow revenge story, nobody is confused about anything thats happening here. Well I mean you seem to be confused, but not about the comic at least. I mean "You haven't read it!" is a ludicrous response. Unless I guessed really well my previous post alone would be evidence I had. You seem very threatened by people disagreeing with you.
I suppose, in conclusion, you completely misread and misunderstood my post and wrote your little article railing against points I never made. Which means you're either being deliberately obtuse or didn't grasp simple points made in a simple manner (or perhaps I made them poorly, perish the thought). Finally "You come across as weak"? Discussing ones opinion of a middle of the road webcomic? What a mental thing to say. Either way, I'll agree to disagree and stick you on ignore so save yourself the hassle of rehashing your points yet again.
Oh god, will people think I'm "weak" now? How will I live with the shame? Well if I was the main character in this I guess I'd have a sudden shift to sociopathy.
Code:
Mod Note: Please use spoiler tags when talking about chapter-specific or future events.