England won up to the finals. Not they won the finals. Important distinction.Didn't England lose though?
Also, what can you gain if you bet 1 trillion yen on 2008 financial crisis?
It's not like the Government knows what to do best because they don't know the future.Runa say about Trying to save Country economy while doing Tax Evasion.
Well, It is a bit Japan-centric in it's view about the post war boom. It didn't mention aid from America, but to be fair the conditional surrender wouldn't nessesiate a rebuilding of Japan as seen in our timeline.3SC, is this specifically from the point of view of the Japanese? I thought the post war economic boom Japan had was due to intense investment from the West?
I mean idk how illegal it is but i'm sure there are 'tax shelters'/shell companies where it's technical legal due to a loophole or whatever but hope she has a really good lawyer/accountant team on retainer if soso basically she is evading tax by setting up shell company in tax haven
Well, in this comic timeline the war was stopped before it reached a critical point... So yeah things are a bit differentWell, It is a bit Japan-centric in it's view about the post war boom. It didn't mention aid from America, but to be fair the conditional surrender wouldn't nessesiate a rebuilding of Japan as seen in our timeline.
In our timeline, I agree mostly with your view to an extent, as Japan innovated too in it's processes to outcompete Western companies.
It sounds and feels illegal, but is actually completely legal.
Of course, Tax Evasion is a Birthright, It's a must...Runa talk about Trying to save Country economy while doing Tax Evasion.
That line goes really hard what? Gotta follow this girl to the depths of hell.Only by accomplishing that will I save my old soul
They draw it wherever they feel like it. It is a grey area since in theory what she is doing is legal. But government can always claim intention. So it would be up to the government whether to look the other way or notWell, there should be a definition government can use to draw the line on where they can confidently accuse an entity as intentionally avoiding tax, even if it’s within legal loophole. Like, it’s not usually wrong for someone to invest, own, or operate business abroad.
Where do they usually draw the line?