Double-page supporter
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2018
- Messages
- 1,823
@Zephyrus
I just explained why I don't think he broke a rule I don't think should exist.
I just explained why I don't think he broke a rule I don't think should exist.
Go back and ask yourself, did he contest you issuing the warning? My answer is no, he did not say you should not have issued a warning saying "calling something gay is unacceptable", but that you're inconsistent when enforcing the rule that you cited when issuing that warning, that your explanation was unsatisfactory and that you abused your power by picking and choosing when to enforce that rule by doing so only when it fits your bias. Therefore, he did not argue against your action, he did not break that ridiculous rule.5.3.1 Do not argue with a moderator about an action in a thread.
My response: He did not contest your warning, IE he did not argue about the action (I'm referencing that bullshit rule I don't think should exist here), but he did ask about your inconsistency in general, your biases, the vague nature of the rules, and incomplete justifications / reasoning. He never argued about your warning, just your inconsistency and lack of explanations.
No, you abused your power by picking and choosing when to enforce a rule, exhibiting bias when enforcing that rule, presuming and assigning intent without any context, using 5.3.1, a rule that should not exist, to unfairly and incorrectly ban someone to shut down questions and conversations made in opposition to you.I abused my power by...asking someone not to use a word in a particular context again and then letting the user off with nothing more than a warning?
Good lord man, he did not insult you. No one believes that he did. This is the whole reason that this is even a problem. You even admitted to being influenced or making a judgement ruling based off irritation AND picking and choosing when to enforce a rule. Two of the biggest reasons this is even a problem. That's literally two examples of you admitting to abusing your moderator privileges. This is just even more inconsistency.his constant insults made me irritated... His behavior caused me to ding him for 5.3.1, which is a rule I have ignored in other instances... Him insulting me and me being irritated by said insults was not the cause of his ban
I already explained my position on why making it private would be less effective and you're making a caricature of his argument isn't helping you.then he should have either brought it up in PM with me or with other administration. Jumping straight to "You did this. Oh, you say you didn't do this? you're lying. You're a bad person. You shouldn't be in power."
Fair enough, that very well maybe true, but it doesn't matter because from my, and many others, estimation, fundamentally he was correct and you were wrong in that instance. His reason for making that complaint is irrelevant to the truth of the complaint.but I believe he is still holding a grudge from a moderating mistake I made months ago when I missed a report he made on another user and ended up only dinging him for it.
You probably should do that, dude. I'm saying this because I genuinely think you're hurting your case. You're digging deeper and deeper into the hole of complaints that people have against you while making the reason for those complaints all the more salient.I'ma just stay in my tower and judge from afar from now on. :v