Sorry, you and
@CraneBrane must re-read the 128 and 129 again like I did. I do insist I thought like both of you before but I changed my mind after seeing many Japanese comments on MagaPoke (not on Twitter) mentioned about rape in chapter 129 before they're deleted or hidden by the web admin.
And from what I know because I also have an account on MagaPoke, those comments were from different Japanese readers because once your comment is deleted or hidden, you'll not be able to comment for a long period. So, the assumption that those Japanese comments were from the same person or a group of people seemed to be impossible for me.
That's why I was curious why these Japanese people mentioned the same thing and if it's not true, why the web admin quickly deleted them. So, I re-read it carefully and tried to find the answer about the definition of rape in Japan which may be different from the other countries.
Back to Sakura, if we notice carefully from chapter 128 till now, both of Sakura’s arms remain raised above her waist. So she did not remove her own skirt or undressed herself like being accused. So the fucboy is 90% at fault on raping her or whatever you said to soften it as the taking advantage. Please give her justice. We can angry and blame her for being extremely stupid but not to her having sex with the fucboy.
@Alsatia and
@diphuc1 always pinpoint and are right in the matter that Sakura often finds herself unable to resist because she is the type of person who reaches orgasm easily from the kind of genital stimulation as we saw the director and Shinobu performed (and now the fucboy) leaving her too drained to fight back afterward.
Consequently, Sakura simply allows the fucboy to do as he pleases. She kissed him back but she did not undress herself. The fucboy removed all her clothes and likely carried her to the bed as well.
This is the reason why the fucboy sticks to the missionary position with both Sakura’s arms always raised above her waist. We never see her embracing him till now, right?
Please be fair.
Also, the author and the artist of Grapara are not the same person. If it's possible that the artist disagree with Airi Katsura (sensei)'s idea but he cannot argue her. So he secretly helped her with his drawings by leaving the plot holes she can use to to fix the story later?