Heimin Shusshin no Teikoku Shoukan, Munou na Kizoku Joukan wo Juurin shite Nariagaru
- Thread starter MangaDex
- Start date
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2019
- Messages
- 1,928
FINALLY THE MANGA ADAPTATION!
I read the novel, and it was great.
I read the novel, and it was great.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2019
- Messages
- 2,583
Is it really good?
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2019
- Messages
- 1,928
The MC is really competent, and it was a fun read. The translation is still being updated regularly.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2019
- Messages
- 2,583
Alright, I'll try it then. Thanks for the clarification
read the novel. it's another do all protagonist that can do no wrong. it's ok if it's your first or second time reading this genre but gets super old by the third one.
I like competent protagonists who know what they're doing but when they read like the author's self insert who knows the plot dozens of chapters ahead, they're more a plot device than an actual character lol.
I like competent protagonists who know what they're doing but when they read like the author's self insert who knows the plot dozens of chapters ahead, they're more a plot device than an actual character lol.
I read the manga, I can't find the light novel, can you please tell me where to read it, the story is interesting😔😔🙏
I read the raw on syousetsu. I think there's a group tl-ing it but I'm not sure about the quality as lots of them are just barely edited mtl.
It can be pretty sickening because its exactly these type of protagonist that are used in many of the korean stories. I cant blame you for getting sick of them.
Double-page supporter
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2024
- Messages
- 137
MC feels like all bark and no bite
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2023
- Messages
- 344
tbf he did killed a bunch of higher ranking ppl on his first day or smth
thats a lot of bite dun u think?
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2025
- Messages
- 11
man where is the chapter's ???? I can only find ch.13
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2018
- Messages
- 742
The great manga dmca sadly. The blast radius was too wide and they got caught in the nukes fury. A Salute for our fallen brothers and fan scanlators.
I dropped this out of principle. Roughly around the 9th chapter a bit of millitary startegy was discussed and it is utterly moronic. I understand wanting to write a competent MC (I enjoyed it personally), I understand understand wanting to write about millitary. However, if you want to write a good story with these 2 elements in it, then you need to know at least the minimum level of millitary strategy. DO NOT FUCCKING STATION TROOPS IN FRONT OF THE FORTRESS WALL!!!!!!!!!!!
On a more serious note. 2 panels, I'll list the mistakes:
1: The fortress is not built on a hill/mountain or besides a river. Those locations are much more defensible.
2: You do know which direction the enemy will attack from. They will come straight towards you. (Stay with me here, because I am going to explain basicly siege warfare here.) The reason they will come straight for you is to get to you as fast as possible, to start the siege as fast as possible. Then, since you are in a fortress that cannot move, they will encircle you. This will cut you off from reinforcements and supplies. Even during the encirclement, they may already start their attacks. Which should consist of bombardment or infantry rushes with ladders. They may also use siege equipment such as towers, to climb the walls, or battering rams, if there is no moat. They will keep up these attacks until you surrender, they overwhelm you or your reinforcements manage to repell them/scare them away.
3: You do not, I'll say it again, you do NOT station troops in front of the fortress. They can defend from within. They can use spears, swords, arrows or even sticks to fight the ones climbing up ladders or ones, who have managed to get up onto the walls.
4: Medieval fortresses needed an attack force 5 to 10 times as large as the defenders. This was, despite there being cannons, mortars, etc, which could inflict damage on walls. (Now I'll say that wall structure evolved in medieval europe. At first they did start off as tall, but thin walls, but as cannons became more widespread and more powerful, walls were made to be smaller, but thicker, often reinforced with earth, as that absorbs shocks better than stone. However given the setting, small, thick walls should be the norm in this world. With mages around, who could possibly inflic major damage, they would be the equivalents of cannons.)
Right after the 2 panels, where these 4 mistakes were made, I stopped, as these are so fundemental and easy to understand concepts, imo, that it's simply inexcusable to get them wrong. Otherwise I enjoyed and if you can look ast these issues, I recommend it, but I can't.
On a more serious note. 2 panels, I'll list the mistakes:
1: The fortress is not built on a hill/mountain or besides a river. Those locations are much more defensible.
2: You do know which direction the enemy will attack from. They will come straight towards you. (Stay with me here, because I am going to explain basicly siege warfare here.) The reason they will come straight for you is to get to you as fast as possible, to start the siege as fast as possible. Then, since you are in a fortress that cannot move, they will encircle you. This will cut you off from reinforcements and supplies. Even during the encirclement, they may already start their attacks. Which should consist of bombardment or infantry rushes with ladders. They may also use siege equipment such as towers, to climb the walls, or battering rams, if there is no moat. They will keep up these attacks until you surrender, they overwhelm you or your reinforcements manage to repell them/scare them away.
3: You do not, I'll say it again, you do NOT station troops in front of the fortress. They can defend from within. They can use spears, swords, arrows or even sticks to fight the ones climbing up ladders or ones, who have managed to get up onto the walls.
4: Medieval fortresses needed an attack force 5 to 10 times as large as the defenders. This was, despite there being cannons, mortars, etc, which could inflict damage on walls. (Now I'll say that wall structure evolved in medieval europe. At first they did start off as tall, but thin walls, but as cannons became more widespread and more powerful, walls were made to be smaller, but thicker, often reinforced with earth, as that absorbs shocks better than stone. However given the setting, small, thick walls should be the norm in this world. With mages around, who could possibly inflic major damage, they would be the equivalents of cannons.)
Right after the 2 panels, where these 4 mistakes were made, I stopped, as these are so fundemental and easy to understand concepts, imo, that it's simply inexcusable to get them wrong. Otherwise I enjoyed and if you can look ast these issues, I recommend it, but I can't.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2020
- Messages
- 700
It seems the author has decided the target audience are readers that don't understand the basics of siege warfare. Sadly, this category is overwhelmingly greater than the ones who DO understand siege warefare.
Thankfully, though they boast the numbers necessary to besiege your group... they lack the tactical ability to do so.
Similar threads
