I'm fascinated by the sort of artwork-quality-drop that happens during the game sequence. It may just be that the artist is drawing something they're less-familiar-with, but it actually lends a weird sense of fidelity to it to me.
A lot of the time these sell the idea that "the game world is the better reality", but here it ends up actually
feeling more like the sort of places where these sorts of interactions happen; like, "Yeah, I spend a lot of time in this actually kind of old game where what matters is who I know there."
Yuri just proves that men & women, het & homo are the same - they just want successful younger model/actress/rich person to unconditionally love them for who they are.
Oddly, this does not actually appear to be broadly true.
At least, to the extent studies have been able to discern, men tend to (
tend to is important here, individual preferences vary greatly as we all know!) most-prefer younger women as they get older (settling around preferring women in their mid-twenties no matter how old the man gets, which is slightly disturbing).
Women tend broadly to prefer men around their own age.
It's not like I have the background to evaluate the studies showing this for any flawed methodology so take it with a grain of salt, but it makes a depressing amount of sense from a detached, evolutionary mating-strategy standpoint (like many unpleasant things about humans), e.g. scummy men leave lots of kids; but women might prefer guys who might actually stick around to help
raise those children.
Let's do a bit of a recap, since it seems like some people are commenting without having read the chapter or otherwise talking out of their ass.
Also, note that unlike you, I did not call you an idiot or even implied that you were dumb.
⃰ ahem ⃰ I think you forgot what you already typed a bit there, mate.
...Look, as an outsider to this conversation, since it's quite possible you're not aware how you're coming off: You're not really listening to what the other person is saying past your first-blush impression of what they might mean, several arguments you seem to be starting just for the sake of arguing / scoring points,
and you're in vocally denial that this is what you're doing / that you're being combative. Unless your goal is to rage-bait, this isn't really going to be an effective approach to communication here.
As someone who (inadvisably) frequently does all that too, I will point out that some (predominantly male) parts of the internet enjoy this kind of slightly-toxic debate where everyone insinuates that everyone else is dumb and then pretends they didn't, and that's fine, but try to read the room on time and place and context a little?
(I don't mean this as an
ad hominem. The actual
substance of what you're trying to say seems like it might be a reasonable position to take, potentially. The issue is in how you're choosing to pursue it.)