Claire:
"Evil comes about to due to poverty and it's the lawmakers who are neglecting that poverty. In other words, the problem lies in this country's structure..."
What about personal responsibility? Poverty is a factor in people committing crime, but it's not the only one. Everyone has a choice on the actions they do. It's fine to have a discussion about what contributed to people committing crimes, but I really don't care for the way the author, through Claire, is trying to make it seem like it's entirely the fault of the country's structure. I'm noticing a pattern of murderers and attempted murders getting massive sympathy from the author. Every one of them has a tragic backstory to justify their actions. The author keeps trying to oversimplify complex issues into this black and white framework.
Also, Claires statement ignores the nobility and rich merchants doing evil. Those groups fall outside of what she thinks causes evil. Rei sort of starts to make this point, but because she only cares about Claire, and nothing else, we don't get an actual conversation about the topic. So instead, the author introduces a complex issue, uses Claire as her mouthpiece to promote her political beliefs. Then doesn't have anyone give more than token resistance to it. A really good author would have characters present convincing and logical counterarguments against their own beliefs. And then defeat those beliefs later. If the author wants complex issues, give them the space and respect to work through them. Otherwise, keep the manga more lighthearted. You can't have both.