Ha! The joke is on the author. In the final text, Article 13 is now Article 17. Article 13 is now about negotiation mechanisms 😎
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8-TA-2019-0231+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN
@FireCamp
Fortunately, memes are (legally) safe. The Directive enshrines exceptions for the
"use for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche"... but only because people agitated about it; the original texts that the Council and the Parliament agreed on were conspicuously silent about any kind of exceptions, hence the panic. I don't like this Directive (no matter how they word it, they're literally asking for filters galore), but it could have been much, much worse.
@SlyLuck @lastKANAshimi @Kaarme
Yep, technically, the definition of online content-sharing service provider, the crux of the matter, is that
"the main or one of the main purposes is to store and give the public access to a large amount of copyright-protected works or other protected subject matter uploaded by its users" (which fits Mangadex),
"which it organises and promotes for profit-making purposes" (which doesn't seem to fit).
Of course, since this is a Directive (basically guidelines for future laws), it will depend on the country, and I can also see judges deeming "donations" a cover for profit-making. The only services that are specifically exempted no matter how the countries try to spin it are "not-for-profit online encyclopedias, not-for-profit educational and scientific repositories, open source software-developing and-sharing platforms, electronic communication service providers as defined in Directive (EU) 2018/1972, online marketplaces, business-to-business cloud services and cloud services that allow users to upload content for their own use".