And that's your opinion, one not supported by the story. Otherwise she would be calling herself Nahisa in the privacy of her own thoughts. Instead it's just Aria.
If I mix sugar into a glass of pure water, is it still pure water? They both look the same and pour out the cup the same, but are they actually still the same water?
And by your logic new memories kills off the old you. So the contents becomes irrelevant.
I clarified and emphasized many times before, in my many replies to you, that my stance is that Aria is not literally dead but Aria before age 10 is a different person from the current Aria. And since current Aria is different, she is not the same person. But nice of you to conveniently ignore everything I've said in this thread, and twist my words to suit your needs.
O . o
Because that sure looks like you're of the opinion that the additional memories killed the old Aria then and there.
You take my original post and completely ignore everything else that I have said in my replies, thus twisting the actual meaning of everything I have said thus far. You know exactly what I meant my in replies to you. Or do I actually have to post the definitions for "Clarified", "Emphasized", and "Replies" to you?
Except you made very specific statements and then above claimed you didn't. True you have since made addition statements to "clarify" your position, but did so without a retracting any of the previous assertations. So forgive me if I emphasize your earlier replies that blatantly contradict your own current position.
And to me the change is irrelevant. As is the fact that the knowledge from her previous life alters her personality. She is and always has been the same person. One personality didn't die, so the new one could take hold.
O . o
Not really no. True you're annoying, but I only reply when I've got nothing better to do. So do go on about how she isn't who she was just because of a few additional memories.
Except that original reply was in reply to someone else's comment. And that person obviously meant the old Aria was dead metaphorically. Otherwise that person would not have used the term "technically". If you really old enough to have grandchildren, you should already know what "technically" means.
This is a debate. I put forth my arguments, then you give your own arguments to counter mine.
Which you agreed with and reiterated with your own supporting opinion... and now failing to form a compelling argument for why that contradiction doesn't invalidate your reasoning, you resort to attacking my intelligence and ability to comprehend simple terminology.
You stated opinions, quoted comment similar to your own, and have since done little to advance your arguments except regurgitate them and insult anyone who disagreed.
O . o;
Odd, I could have sworn you said much the same in other comments, yet here we are... Then again, I am getting up there in years and might just be going senile.
Unfortunately it seems like story setting up the prince for her which is something i hate in these stories because it feels unearned. They have already set up the age gap being normal with the father and mother.
You are entirely correct but mangaka is the one who fucked up in that regard in the earlier chapters. FMC kept referring to her younger self as a separate entity for some weird reason which is ridiculous in the context of her reincarnation. It's a plot hole written into the story.
yes and no, from what god said she only regained her memories at 10 years old because this was the way for her to live a normal childhood, well i that guess not even god knows the future... so tecnically she was always Aria but yes she is kind of a different person now, but it is still her
