@Purplelibraryguy Well the ideal for me would be to:
[ul]
[li] give us readers important reasons and motivations for her actions; [/li]
[li] call the marriage off before the day of the ceremony, or at least a few hours before; and [/li]
[li] give a profuse apology towards the groom, or at least somehow acknowledge that his feelings on the situation do matter.[/li][/ul]
Doing all three of those would have made me support her. Doing
just one of those, even just the first one, would have felt like less of a slap in the
face absence of facial characteristics. But no; she elected to do precisely none of them.
The only thing I will acknowledge is that a loveless marriage is an affront that lasts for years or decades, whereas what she did is an affront that will die down within months with "merely" her being excommunicated by everyone who was invited. I mean yes, to some extent being hit by a car is better than being hit by a train, but…