@Gotim18
yeah, if they are persistent then stepping in to help is just being decent. I'm just pointing out that it is true that the notion that you must be the one to step in or that you can pester a woman until her boyfriend shows up. It isn't a matter of different definitions, we don't get to have our own personal or convenient definitions of objectification. It's literal objectification. It's just that we don't associate it with objectification. The implication of it is still that she's an object.
So, yeah, if he waits for her to actually need help then he's good but if he steps in before that, it's objectification. It's not something people normally realize so I'm pointing it out. There is no different definition to argue here.
@FredFriendly
I said if they are persistent OR actually touch them. You don't have to wait for them to touch them but you should immediately if they do. If they are timid, even to the point where outright saying no is difficult, then they still wouldn't agree to it immediately. If they are still going after them without getting a "yes", that is being persistent, then step in.
also, oddly enough, respecting them and doing what they like are two different things. You could do a lot of nice things for a person that does not respect them as a functioning adult. So, the other persons appreciation actually isn't a metric of if they are being objectified. After all, much of "chivalry" is rooted in objectification and assumptions of weakness.