I know I’m diving deep in sociopolitical territory, but… I do wish that if a character is going to be made with as intricate and complex disposition as a “master of connections”, that they would dive deeper into the various things that he is involved in. In doing so, you’d find some glaring holes that just smell of bs. He is in charge of a mercenary group, as well as a few orphanages within various countries. Orphanages are famous for having been exploited ruthlessly by various organizations, including nobility. How are you going to protect them without crossing his, perceived, bottom line? He can’t fight that well, not compared to a small private army. And mercenaries… especially in a medieval-like setting here? Unless they are the most super soft bunch that hug to incapacitate, they have done quite a few unsavory acts against other humans, possibly even good-aligned, just not to their standards or just part of their job. And yet, threats, deception, fraud are within his no no square? It’s really thin. It’s thin enough that this whole thought process came up within a couple seconds of him stating his no go zone. Power level of a trained commoner, but with the importance of a semi global shadow government leader, his whole existence is a threat and yet “he doesn’t do that”…..