@CuddleStruggle
Yes, you, and a lot of other war-obsessed weirdos, have a power fetish. Strength and power SHOULD be utilized only when peaceful negotiations don't work. Just because tyrants and inhumane groups of people have exploited power to systematically oppress and dehumanize groups of people does not mean it was the moral thing to do? The Black Lives Matter movement has tried and is currently trying to peacefully create change. The riots are not the majority. And if the "stronger" side always wins and peace and kindness are not useable or negotiable, the military would have stamped out the movement. But thankfully, good people sympathize and protest with the movement and refuse to stand with injustice. Unlike the stereotypical american war fanboys' point of view, war should be a last resort.
As humans, we all have enough in common. And you forget that there is power and strength in non-literal power and strength. Don't speak as if protests, the spread of knowledge, and peaceful negotiations and publications have not done a lot for this country already.
Also omg wow king youre right not every abuse/rape survivors kills herself!! It's only a third of the victims that are suicidal. Half of the women who have attempted suicide have been reportedly sexually abused. I can assume that this statistic is less than the actual percentage because of the lack of reports, and how prominent sexual abuse still is today.
Additionally, that girl should not have hit you. That is true in ANY scenario. However, if that's something that's happening to you often, maybe you are the escalator? Just a thought. In any case, that's STILL not meaningful privilege at all. No one who advocates for women's rights is advocating for the ability to hit men.
And still, again, none of this negates female oppression and patriarchal oppression?? When men suffer because of toxic masculinity and gender roles, that is STILL a result of the patriarchy. If you actually want to make a change you should be fighting to change it, not demeaning the activists and proponents of change. Unless you want women to take up arms and revolt? Is a power struggle necessary to you rather than affording basic humanity and respect? Nothing you're saying about men dying in war or otherwise has anything to do with oppression against men on the basis of gender. And, again, even if men WERE oppressed on the basis of gender (keep in mind, they are not) it would still not negate female oppression, and therefore women's rights should and would still be advocated for, and not demeaned or silenced.
You are never certain that the clump of cells will become a baby. It is only potential for a human life, but also the potential for a miscarriage or stillborn. You CAN however be certain that the pregnancy or potential subsequent birth will negatively impact or harm the mother. But you don't care about her rights. The clump of cells does NOT have rights and is not a person. Embryos die all the time; should they be included in any death count? Any of your sperm has the potential to fertilize an egg and become a baby. But sperm are not babies. A fertilized egg is not a baby. A baby is, shockingly, a baby. Anything you want to say about anti-abortion has been said and refuted a billion times. for god's sake. just search it up it is easily accessible. It is not your decision as you are clearly not a woman with a fertilized egg. About this abortion argument, are you just bringing up any controversial topic for fun? I don't particularly care we can argue gay rights too.
"The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit."
W. Maugham
funny
I don't know if I've covered all of what you've said. There is a lot more to say, of course, but please do your own research on female oppression if you want to be a more empathetic and well-informed person. None of your arguments are new, and neither are my counters. Still open to a private discussion.
If its about competition those cells lost the fight 
