@gingerreadsthings:
FWIW, and noting that this is not in any way my area of expertise, South Korea has fairly rigid economic/social class divides (not formalized castes like the old India stuff; to my impression moreso a society where who you know and how much money you have determines your opportunities and social status, and everyone knows it.)
I at least know some number of Korean dramas love both their cross-caste romances (that is to say, it's stratified enough that that's considered an interesting plot-line) and having terrifying upper-class characters who engage in aristocratic power-plays in whatever social spheres are at hand. I assume most of it is dramatization, but still.
My
assumption about scenes like the one here has always been that—keeping in mind that this is total armchair musing on my part and may be completely wrong—whilst most of the Korean populace might be unhappy about this state of affairs, Koreans both have a strong image of how an upper class behaves (be it through reality or fictionalized dramatizations thereof), and perhaps a certain amount of envy for being on the advantageous side of that power gap (as some always do, when there's a noticeable socioeconomic power gap in place).
Like, the American equivalent of this scene would, by this theory, probably be the one where you buy the company of the person that wronged you in some petty way, and then have them fired. Every culture has their rich-person power-play-with-disproportionate-consequences fantasies to some extent, and we all have different blind-spots regarding just exactly how wrong these things are... or so I'm theorizing, anyway.
Somebody who's actually Korean or lived in Korea can probably say a lot more about how far off base I am here XD