Considering the face of that commander I'm not too sure this is the same timeline as ours...Damn he really gouged out his eye so he could take the kid. Respect to him.
This story seems super interesting so I’m excited to see how this goes on even if it contradicts with irl knowledge cause im 90% sure that Fermat’s Theorem was solved in 1993 lmao
Thabks for the TL
All just because a not so funny prank...Damn he really gouged out his eye so he could take the kid. Respect to him.
This story seems super interesting so I’m excited to see how this goes on even if it contradicts with irl knowledge cause im 90% sure that Fermat’s Theorem was solved in 1993 lmao
Thabks for the TL
He pulled it out with his hand, hardcore as fuck.I like his views on comparing facts to discrimination but shooting the eye though? Hardcore.
Wow I thought he shot and that was the last bullet, but for some reason I ignored the top left of the spread. SheeshI wonder how me, a mathlet, will do reading this manga.
He pulled it out with his hand, hardcore as fuck.
Well there is a connection here! The modularity theorem (formerly known as the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture) was first conjectured by two Japanese men in 1957, and Wiles' 1994 proof of it for semistable elliptic curves had Fermats Last Theory as a corollary.Damn he really gouged out his eye so he could take the kid. Respect to him.
This story seems super interesting so I’m excited to see how this goes on even if it contradicts with irl knowledge cause im 90% sure that Fermat’s Theorem was solved in 1993 lmao
Thabks for the TL
I have no reason to believe Fermat's Last Theorem was chosen for any reason other than the fact that it has a special place in popular culture. There are any number of unsolved problems in mathematics that could have worked. I highly doubt the author was cognizant of the connection, though it is pretty neat.Well there is a connection here! The modularity theorem (formerly known as the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture) was first conjectured by two Japanese men in 1957, and Wiles' 1994 proof of it for semistable elliptic curves had Fermats Last Theory as a corollary.
the thing is, this also is kinda reminding me of the VERY related abc conjecture for which a proof was created by Mochizuki, in which a fatal flaw was later found (and now Mochizuki is very hostile towards everybody who doesn't believe him, so very few people do).I have no reason to believe Fermat's Last Theorem was chosen for any reason other than the fact that it has a special place in popular culture. There are any number of unsolved problems in mathematics that could have worked. I highly doubt the author was cognizant of the connection, though it is pretty neat.
To be frank with you, I was kinda in a frenzy because of the ragebait in the chapter when I wrote that response to you. Thinking about it more seriously, it would make sense for the author to have some mathematical background, or at least to have done a fair amount of research. It's not implausible that there's some historical basis to the story. I don't really have any mathematical background beyond calculus, and I'm not informed on the history of mathematics/current mathematicalthe thing is, this also is kinda reminding me of the VERY related abc conjecture for which a proof was created by Mochizuki, in which a fatal flaw was later found (and now Mochizuki is very hostile towards everybody who doesn't believe him, so very few people do).
Correct me if I'm wrong about any of this, diophantine analysis and IUTT is absolutely not my strong suit! :^]