Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2018
- Messages
- 496
@mikegnesium I’m just arguing the part where you say sexual attraction is inherent to romance. While it does apply to a lot of people, it simply doesn’t apply to some people. Also, I think the attraction she feels for Akira is more an example of ludus than eros.
If you really want to break it down to it’s most clinical form, lust is fueled by estrogen and testosterone, attraction is created by norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin, whereas attachment (which is the love aspect) operates on oxytocin and vasopressin. It’s just that some people don’t operate on the first stage and have to start at the second stage. People probably have the misconception that sex and love are inherently tied together because a bunch of oxytocin is produced through intercourse, but oxytocin is produced in other ways, so sex isn’t necessary in a romantic relationship. Maybe for some people, just not all.
Also, y’know, Belle? From Beauty and the Beast? Haven’t you seen that? I could believe it if you haven’t seen it, but I refuse to believe that you haven’t even heard of it.
Also, there isn’t anything you can say to convince me otherwise, because I’m one of those people who don’t feel sexual attraction. On a good day, the most I feel about sex is ambivalence (on a bad day, the chest bursters from Alien look like a more natural, less grotesque form of procreation than sexual intercourse from my perspective, without any hint of hyperbole or exaggeration), but I’m still able to feel romantic attraction. I was still able to have a crush on someone and liked them in a different way than other people and would like to go on dates with them, I just didn’t want sex.
If you really want to break it down to it’s most clinical form, lust is fueled by estrogen and testosterone, attraction is created by norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin, whereas attachment (which is the love aspect) operates on oxytocin and vasopressin. It’s just that some people don’t operate on the first stage and have to start at the second stage. People probably have the misconception that sex and love are inherently tied together because a bunch of oxytocin is produced through intercourse, but oxytocin is produced in other ways, so sex isn’t necessary in a romantic relationship. Maybe for some people, just not all.
Also, y’know, Belle? From Beauty and the Beast? Haven’t you seen that? I could believe it if you haven’t seen it, but I refuse to believe that you haven’t even heard of it.
Also, there isn’t anything you can say to convince me otherwise, because I’m one of those people who don’t feel sexual attraction. On a good day, the most I feel about sex is ambivalence (on a bad day, the chest bursters from Alien look like a more natural, less grotesque form of procreation than sexual intercourse from my perspective, without any hint of hyperbole or exaggeration), but I’m still able to feel romantic attraction. I was still able to have a crush on someone and liked them in a different way than other people and would like to go on dates with them, I just didn’t want sex.