Kyougaku Koukou no Genjitsu - Vol. 6 Ch. 70
- Thread starter MangaDex
- Start date
Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2020
- Messages
- 223
@Tcof
1) She didn't know AND REFUSED TO LISTEN. She had every single opportunity to actually listen AND REFUSED TO LISTEN. Let's say there's a person who is told that milk sold in stores comes from cows. Then they refuse to believe it despite being told time and time again. She doesn't want to learn. She doesn't care.
You say his explanation didn't sound convincing and that any sane person would think the same? Says who? You're the one saying that it's the only conclusion. The teacher is the only one who thinks that it's so obvious. The only reason that the teacher thinks that it's so obvious is because she doesn't care to see the fact that she's wrong.
2) So then it's good to ignore the honest pleas of one student because other students are bad? I'm sorry, that's what makes you a good teacher? Hey, teacher, there are some bad students in class, therefore you should treaty every single one of them as bad.
That is what we call a bad teacher. That is what we call horrible.
The problem is that you ONLY see her perspective. The problem is that SHE only sees her own perspective. She refuses to listen. What is so hard about this? In literally any other situation, we would call out this kind of person as being prejudiced. She is literally pre judging. It's literally prejudice because she won't listen.
Let me be clear. If he never told her that he was a boy, then this would be fine. If he told her only once or so, then maybe that would be fine too. It would make sense. He went above and beyond. He tried telling her over and over and over. She didn't care. She didn't give a single crap about what he said. To her, she was already right no matter what. That is called prejudice. That is called horrible.
1) She didn't know AND REFUSED TO LISTEN. She had every single opportunity to actually listen AND REFUSED TO LISTEN. Let's say there's a person who is told that milk sold in stores comes from cows. Then they refuse to believe it despite being told time and time again. She doesn't want to learn. She doesn't care.
You say his explanation didn't sound convincing and that any sane person would think the same? Says who? You're the one saying that it's the only conclusion. The teacher is the only one who thinks that it's so obvious. The only reason that the teacher thinks that it's so obvious is because she doesn't care to see the fact that she's wrong.
2) So then it's good to ignore the honest pleas of one student because other students are bad? I'm sorry, that's what makes you a good teacher? Hey, teacher, there are some bad students in class, therefore you should treaty every single one of them as bad.
That is what we call a bad teacher. That is what we call horrible.
The problem is that you ONLY see her perspective. The problem is that SHE only sees her own perspective. She refuses to listen. What is so hard about this? In literally any other situation, we would call out this kind of person as being prejudiced. She is literally pre judging. It's literally prejudice because she won't listen.
Let me be clear. If he never told her that he was a boy, then this would be fine. If he told her only once or so, then maybe that would be fine too. It would make sense. He went above and beyond. He tried telling her over and over and over. She didn't care. She didn't give a single crap about what he said. To her, she was already right no matter what. That is called prejudice. That is called horrible.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2018
- Messages
- 4,243
@nbhstcqbvvpmacjrmv
1.
SO yeah, you completed ignored the fact that " trap is suppose to be hard to believe it is a boy" if you know not already know them (and some time still doubt even you already know them) which is the entirely point. Which is a FACT and not my opinion. Literally!
2.
It is not because "there are already bad student" But because he is just doing the same what the girls did
And aren't i already said she misunderstand ? yes she did, by a very understandable reason, that even the victim himself could understand
But this
1.
NO, just no ! EVERYBODY would !
SO yeah, you completed ignored the fact that " trap is suppose to be hard to believe it is a boy" if you know not already know them (and some time still doubt even you already know them) which is the entirely point. Which is a FACT and not my opinion. Literally!
2.
Wow, Wow wow wow wow, wow!
It is not because "there are already bad student" But because he is just doing the same what the girls did
And aren't i already said she misunderstand ? yes she did, by a very understandable reason, that even the victim himself could understand
But this
is the most bullshit thing i hear this week. With this logic, I bet you also believe 5g wifi tower cause Covid-19
Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2020
- Messages
- 223
@Tcof
1) You're making a baseless claim. When he is dressed in a boy's uniform, people do not go up to him and say hey, you must be lying about that. You're actually a girl. No, that is not what happens. They joke with him and say he looks girlish, but they do not go so far as to outright say he is definitely a girl no matter what he says.
2) Your distinction makes no difference. Yes, it is the same as having one bad student. Again, she refuses to listen to his explanation. If she believed his explanation, then his action would not be bad in the first place. How about this. A teacher had one student ask to go to the bathroom and then the student used drugs there. Therefore, whenever anyone asks to go to the bathroom, the teacher just unfairly assumes that they're all using drugs and refuses. It's the same thing.
At the end of the day, I am saying it is unreasonable misunderstanding. It is willful ignorance. She refused to listen to the truth.
And if anything, your position supports bullshit like 5G and coronavirus being linked. Your position is oh, she's okay, forgive the shifty teacher because she honestly thought she was right even though everyone else tried to tell her she was wrong. You don't want to listen to facts. You don't want to listen to science. You don't want to listen to anyone. That is what you support.
1) You're making a baseless claim. When he is dressed in a boy's uniform, people do not go up to him and say hey, you must be lying about that. You're actually a girl. No, that is not what happens. They joke with him and say he looks girlish, but they do not go so far as to outright say he is definitely a girl no matter what he says.
2) Your distinction makes no difference. Yes, it is the same as having one bad student. Again, she refuses to listen to his explanation. If she believed his explanation, then his action would not be bad in the first place. How about this. A teacher had one student ask to go to the bathroom and then the student used drugs there. Therefore, whenever anyone asks to go to the bathroom, the teacher just unfairly assumes that they're all using drugs and refuses. It's the same thing.
At the end of the day, I am saying it is unreasonable misunderstanding. It is willful ignorance. She refused to listen to the truth.
And if anything, your position supports bullshit like 5G and coronavirus being linked. Your position is oh, she's okay, forgive the shifty teacher because she honestly thought she was right even though everyone else tried to tell her she was wrong. You don't want to listen to facts. You don't want to listen to science. You don't want to listen to anyone. That is what you support.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2018
- Messages
- 3,295
@HYBRID_BEING aight i let my ts know
