Once a month is fucking brutal. Is this what co-parenting looks like in japan?
of course notOnce a month is fucking brutal. Is this what co-parenting looks like in japan?
A lot of the times they are written only as a sort of mangnifyer device where the rest of the characters image is reflected and amplified into the reader. I'm not really against this since it can bring clarity to moments of grey morality like this one where she (in my opinion) made the right choice of leaving her daughter into the household with a better balance for the kid but has a little of this woe is me attitude about it and then make pivot or give a new goalpost to the story. The consequence is all of this is without exploring the details regarding the kid, so is left as an incomplete character that shouldn't bother too much in the story other than their role, hence these kinds of small adult children.theres a tendency in fiction to write children's internal states and attitudes as kind of, existing at adults convenience rather than being shaped by primarily by how their actual developmental needs are fulfilled. it makes the adults surrounding them look better comparitively, but it results in these flat, unrealistic child characters that just serve as set dressing for the adults in their life(which i guess, is what many people assume kids should be).
Children should not be allowed on the internetThis manga is so ass.
although I think there‘s more to be elaborated, the answer is pretty obviously because as a single woman in a heavily patriarchal society she doesn’t have the power to oppose her ex-husband and his family: effectively her relationship with her child is entirely at their whimsthis might sound callous but i really dont understand why she doesnt at least text and facetime her child regularly. like all this talk abt wanting to be present and a understanding figure that akari can rely on, but theres really no attempt to like, actually be present or understand her as an individual.
theres a tendency in fiction to write children's internal states and attitudes as kind of, existing at adults convenience rather than being shaped by primarily by how their actual developmental needs are fulfilled. it makes the adults surrounding them look better comparitively, but it results in these flat, unrealistic child characters that just serve as set dressing for the adults in their life(which i guess, is what many people assume kids should be).
this might sound callous but i really dont understand why she doesnt at least text and facetime her child regularly. like all this talk abt wanting to be present and a understanding figure that akari can rely on, but theres really no attempt to like, actually be present or understand her as an individual.
We lack context here, but I've been in the kid's situation with my mother, we were alone with my grandparents near us. At some point she had to move out for work for a year and a half and we talked on the phone like 2 times a week, she always called. Idk, the only thing we have seen until now is she only talks to her only in the mandatory time with her. I'm not saying she shouldn't think about living with her, but there is a disconnect between what she thinks and what she does.Guess it depends on how busy ppl are tho i'd imagine the kid would also be busy with studying/her own friends unless her dad is subtly trying to limit their time together (she prolly can't use a smartphone at school tho versus setting up a time to like borrow her dad's phone/ipad or so for face time, and like her friend said, she was struggling just to keep it together by herself)
i imagine this takes modern day but depending on how old she or the author is, maybe they're just from a generation where it's uncommon to just call for no reason versus like a once a week call
Surprised there's not a drama tag too rather than just the comedy even if the beginning was light hearted
Would be interesting to see this get a live action
I feel like it is a limitation of writing a narrative centered around local food tourism in japan. It comes off as very non-commital to most of the characters in the human drama, any forward action gets under cut by the actual comission and is never shown to be the vice it actually is. The closest the narrative ever got to framing her form of cope as something harmful was a few chapters back juxtaposing her going for a drink then somberly thinking about her kid, only to be met with more chapters like this one where it begins the narrative but seemingly gets resolved by drinking and eating with nothing actually being done.this might sound callous but i really dont understand why she doesnt at least text and facetime her child regularly. like all this talk abt wanting to be present and a understanding figure that akari can rely on, but theres really no attempt to like, actually be present or understand her as an individual.
theres a tendency in fiction to write children's internal states and attitudes as kind of, existing at adults convenience rather than being shaped by primarily by how their actual developmental needs are fulfilled. it makes the adults surrounding them look better comparitively, but it results in these flat, unrealistic child characters that just serve as set dressing for the adults in their life(which i guess, is what many people assume kids should be).
i think this, along with that aside abt a woman's estranged family actually loving her bc they badgered her husband for her ashes after she died, is indicative of a somewhat iffy perspective of familial relationships on the authors part. where years of lackluster parenting can be made up for with ~vibes~ in real life things rarely work out like that.
this might sound callous but i really dont understand why she doesnt at least text and facetime her child regularly.