Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2023
- Messages
- 2,073
I've already addressed this assertion in the rest of the comment you responded to. I'll add that it's unproductive to juggle moral classifications of characters in this kind of conversation because it obscures the reality that we're still talking about a character. The "bad situation" attribute can be applied to any character, "horridly evil" or not, to engender sympathy from the reader...Ok, first of all, you don't "flesh out" the horridly evil character with a "he came from bad situation" circumstances unless your intent is to force the reader to sympathise with them. There's literally no other reason to do it
...or for some other purpose.
Fleshing out any character in any way can be done for doing's sake, for the sake of other characters and/or events in the present or future of the narrative, and/or for the sake of some theme. And those are just general ideas off the top of my head-- never mind the specific "needs" that appear in a specific writing context.
Writing isn't math, and an author's intents often extend beyond simple emotional responses to the characters. The idea that this writing decision like this one has to be to force the reader to sympathize and feel as though his actions were justified almost certainly comes from 1) a lack of creativity, and 2) a lack of willingness to own one's reactions to a work (since the author can't force you to feel anything, and can at most attempt to make you understand the narrative).
Last edited: