What'd she do wrong? When you're up against American globalism gotta tap in the deus ex machina gourmet to save the day through some roundabout morality lesson via food.…I hate this manga sometimes. Seriously, Kurita?! What the Hell?
I assume you're being facetious, but just in case, the going behind Yamaoka's back to do it. Kaibara wasn't even involved in this one, she literally brought him in as an implicit statement that she had no faith in Yamaoka's ability to resolve the problem on his own. And if that's the case, what does that say about her faith in Yamaoka to run the Ultimate Menu, or do anything else? It's the author wrecking Kurita's character to give Kaibara another chance to show everyone up, and it pisses me off.What'd she do wrong? When you're up against American globalism gotta tap in the deus ex machina gourmet to save the day through some roundabout morality lesson via food.
I mean, Kurita has always been a Kaibara stan. Like over the many chapters she has always had this "I know you don't like your dad, Yamaoka, but he is a super great guy" kind of attitude about Kaibara. Even though she would stick up for Yamaoka and argue with Kaibara during their Menu contests, outside of those competitions she does always act like Kaibara is a food god.I assume you're being facetious, but just in case, the going behind Yamaoka's back to do it. Kaibara wasn't even involved in this one, she literally brought him in as an implicit statement that she had no faith in Yamaoka's ability to resolve the problem on his own. And if that's the case, what does that say about her faith in Yamaoka to run the Ultimate Menu, or do anything else? It's the author wrecking Kurita's character to give Kaibara another chance to show everyone up, and it pisses me off.
I assume you're being facetious, but just in case, the going behind Yamaoka's back to do it. Kaibara wasn't even involved in this one, she literally brought him in as an implicit statement that she had no faith in Yamaoka's ability to resolve the problem on his own. And if that's the case, what does that say about her faith in Yamaoka to run the Ultimate Menu, or do anything else? It's the author wrecking Kurita's character to give Kaibara another chance to show everyone up, and it pisses me off.
I mean, Kurita has always been a Kaibara stan. Like over the many chapters she has always had this "I know you don't like your dad, Yamaoka, but he is a super great guy" kind of attitude about Kaibara. Even though she would stick up for Yamaoka and argue with Kaibara during their Menu contests, outside of those competitions she does always act like Kaibara is a food god.
It's clear author favouritism, that. It's one of the things I get annoyed at this author about. To be fair to him in this case, at least he's kind of consistent.
Uh, you're correct but that wasn't the point of my comment.Atleast when Toyama-sensei does it, he has the context of " I am basically Yamaoka's grandpa, out of everyone in the cast that isnt Yamaoka and Kaibara, I know what happend the most. Thats why I take this sort of neutral stance on it. "
I think he too undersells whats been established but to his credit, hes a character who knows stuff we the readers dont yet.
Kurita comes across as a busybody who also undersells the situation (the one she isnt even entirely privy to, she knows what Kariya knows, if that makes sense) by basically going " I know you were abused and your mom died because of said abuse but c'mooon, your dad isnt ALL bad. " It just makes me go " ...Gross. "
Coworker (not SO), literally not your business. Even as they compete against him, literal privacy of personal business being ignored like this is jarring.
You are 100% correct. My post was using criticism of the character as shorthand for criticism of the author and story direction. Just makes things simpler.Uh, you're correct but that wasn't the point of my comment.
The person I was replying to was saying that Kurita bringing in Kaibara indicates that she has no faith in Yamaoka. My point is that is not about having faith in Yamaoka's ability, but the author wants to write that Kurita thinks that Kaibara has the ability to help turn the tables (like with the whale issue).
It's not her fault, because she isn't a human being with agency. It's the author's fault for wanting to insert Kaibara into this stupid plot. If the author wanted Yamaoka to have the spotlight and leave Kaibara out, he could very damn well pull some bullshit and have Yamaoka do or say the exact same thing.
I get you, I kind of treat author and character as interchangeable sometimes too.You are 100% correct. My post was using criticism of the character as shorthand for criticism of the author and story direction. Just makes things simpler.