Group Leader
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2020
- Messages
- 36
Kudos for fighting misinformation.First of all, you seemingly don't understand how the science community works. Science isn't about opinion or public pressure, it's about recording observable reality. Two even when it WAS in the DSM-IV-TR, it wasn't listed under paraphilias or disorders. It was an "associated feature" of what was called Gender Identity Disorder at the time. As understanding of psychology progressed, so did the understanding of gender dysphoric people so it was appropriately updated to reflect that understanding. They didn't do it because "some people made a fuss".
Three? All of that doesn't even matter because what Minato is doing here isn't what wouldn't even be characterized as autogynephilia when it was in the DSM. Minato isn't imagining his body being literally female. The term you're looking for "Tranvestic fetishism", which is still in the DSM-V.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transvestic_fetishism
Which yeah, I would agree is what Minato is displaying here. At least until he's done for.
The term you're looking for "Tranvestic fetishism", which is still in the DSM-V.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transvestic_fetishism
Which yeah, I would agree is what Minato is displaying here. At least until he's done for.