Opinion : on ; the act of existence , Ideal world , & al.

[WanderingWanderer]

It's a parody of "Do androids dream of electric sheep?"
I guess it's LLM cuz they are the AI that's making the rounds and math formulas cuz you use them a lot. No clue why the isekai harems though.

 

[UnnamedPlayer]

I don't know either.

...

Or are you implying there is people on this earth that don't want to have a full harem after being isekaied ?

 

[WanderingWanderer]

That one harem manga where protag is gay hahah. But its not isekai, sadly

 

[jecroisenlasuperioritedubel]

It's a parody of "Do androids dream of electric sheep?"
I guess it's LLM cuz they are the AI that's making the rounds and math formulas cuz you use them a lot. No clue why the isekai harems though.

What is the " L.L.M. " , may I learn ; is It the function M , W , P , or Me ?

 

[UnnamedPlayer]

What is the " L.L.M. " , may I learn ; is It the function M , W , P , or Me ?

It mean "Large Language Model", which is the politically correct way to say "Fat Language Model". Did you know LLM loose performance as they grow bigger and ingurgitate more data ?

 

[WanderingWanderer]

Okay, so the trade-off for having infinite knowledge pertaining to ancient english and philosophy is you essentially live under a rock, got it

I bet you don't even know what "skibidi" means! good on you

 

[jecroisenlasuperioritedubel]

It mean "Large Language Model", which is the politically correct way to say "Fat Language Model". Did you know LLM loose performance as they grow bigger and ingurgitate more data ?

I know the meaning of the abbreviation You've used , yet I am still inclined to ask - as You still didn't explain - the question hereafter submited :
" What is being called a L.L.M. ? "

 

[WanderingWanderer]

A large language model is a type of AI that generates natural language and responds to questions in a human-like way. ChatGPT when used to produce speech, for example. Is this what you meant?

Does this answer your question? I'd be happy to clarify

 

[jecroisenlasuperioritedubel]

Okay, so the trade-off for having infinite knowledge pertaining to ancient english and philosophy is you essentially live under a rock, got it

I bet you don't even know what "skibidi" means! good on you

Heavens , My Dear friend , let Me correct You as I think there's a mis-understanding here - as , one may Easily understand , I am Intellectually indistinguishable from a , literally - not figuratively , post-brain-surgery Earth-worm in any Tangible way , therefore ; please Kindly refrain from labeling Me as a person with " infinite knowledge " , as I only Certainly know that I don't know everything and that I don't live in a vacuum. I , also , know what " skibidi " is : It is a term used by Generation α , to share & convey the scene containing the head of a model from a game known as " GMod " appearing in a toilet betwixt Them. ​

 

[jecroisenlasuperioritedubel]

A large language model is a type of AI that generates natural language and responds to questions in a human-like way. ChatGPT when used to produce speech, for example. Is this what you meant?

Does this answer your question? I'd be happy to clarify

The question is : " What is being called a L.L.M. ? ".
The question is for This sentence : " Do LLM dreams of isekai harems full of maths formulaes ? " [ sic ].
The question is not : " What is a L.L.M. ? ".
My reason for asking : This thread has no - intended by author , Me - connection to Neural training & experiments , or similar , therefore ; I can't understand the reasoning enough to answer.

 

[sanctuary]

I'm afraid my math level isn't high enough to actually read all this, so I'll leave it after having read until B(4).
At least I tried. @jecroisenlasuperioritedubel
I wouldn't know how to answer either honestly.

Post the images to Qwen or deepseek and ask it to make a 2y study plan to decipher that, then ask them to export it as a .md file so you can import it to Notion with all the cutesy graphics and checkboxes

 

[WanderingWanderer]

post-brain-surgery Earth-worm

Flowers for Algernon ahh comparison

I , also , know what " skibidi " is : It is a term used by Generation α , to share & convey the scene containing the head of a model from a game known as " GMod " appearing in a toilet betwixt Them.

Your answer makes me profoundly happy inside, it really does. Keep being you, you rock (omg unintentional pun)

 

[jecroisenlasuperioritedubel]

Flowers for Algernon ahh comparison

I am not going to disappear , My friend)

 

[jecroisenlasuperioritedubel]

I'm afraid my math level isn't high enough to actually read all this, so I'll leave it after having read until B(4).
At least I tried. @jecroisenlasuperioritedubel
I wouldn't know how to answer either honestly.

Please , Mine Esteemed interlocutor , don't be afraid - as I wrote You to read only § (A/(2)) , therefore ; You've already Far surpassed what You were called to do , so - that is to say - Your try is actually above & beyond the intended message for You , ergo ; I'll be bold enough to request for You to hold Your-self in a Higher plane , and not only that but I am glad to answer any questions You may have - no matter Their content or level , so do feel free to ask. I wish for Thine happiness from the bottom of Mine hearth , and thank You for taking Your time to not only read but answer to My writing.​

 

[jecroisenlasuperioritedubel]

How useful are those axioms?

That's the Only sentence that's actually important to answer , as all Other sentences are from taking This question's answer as " It does not. " , alas ; let Me share with You a story :​

" ( ... ) Zhuang Zhou dreamed he was a butterfly ( ... ) happy with himself and doing as he pleased. ( ... ) Suddenly he woke up and there he was, solid and unmistakable Zhuang Zhou. But he didn't know if he was Zhuang Zhou who had dreamt he was a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming that he was Zhuang Zhou. ( ... ) ".​

You may ask " What is the point of This story ? " and - still that's a Valid & Important question - I would answer You as such : " The point of This story is to show that even if We take Every-thing in This , faux , reality as true , e.g./ people Really exercising not only fictophilia but also any Other kind of sexuality , We still wouldn't be answering the question of ' If Every-thing in My dream is fake ; do Their wills really belong to Them , or am I believing in a Reality that makes Their wills align with My will ? ' and instead taking the dream's environment as independent , causing Us to say ' I may or may not be in a dream , however ; I will still take These people , and by extension - Their wills , as Real & Independent wills Out-side of My force. ' despite actually being the source of Their wills , even if It doesn't appear that way. " , and then ask " Is This answer sufficient , i.e/ explain the failure of skipping the Thought process , to help You understand ? I will gladly wait for Thine answer. " , and - please - do let Me explain My Main question [ to You ] using symbols :​

Then ;

( For every entity x , if x is in My reality , then x is not real ) MEANS [ either ( For every entity x , if x is in My reality , then x has a will that truly belongs to Them ) OR ( For every entity x , if x is in My reality , then x has a will that aligns with My own will ) ].​

I believe Thine intellect has caught a problem after this explanation , which is : You instantly went from and " either ... or " to " must be " conclusion , while using the justification of the dream It-self.​

 

[WanderingWanderer]

" Is This answer sufficient , i.e/ explain the failure of skipping the Thought process , to help You understand ? I will gladly wait for Thine answer. "

Sorry, hold on, this sentence I don't understand. Are you sure those quotes are in the right place?

 

[jecroisenlasuperioritedubel]

Sorry, hold on, this sentence I don't understand. Are you sure those quotes are in the right place?

Speaker
You :	What is the point of This story ?
Me :	The point of This story is to show that even if We take Every-thing in This , faux , reality as true , e.g./ people Really exercising not only fictophilia but also any Other kind of sexuality , We still wouldn't be answering the question of ' If Every-thing in My dream is fake ; do Their wills really belong to Them , or am I believing in a Reality that makes Their wills align with My will ? ' and instead taking the dream's environment as independent , causing Us to say ' I may or may not be in a dream , however ; I will still take These people , and by extension - Their wills , as Real & Independent wills Out-side of My force. ' despite actually being the source of Their wills , even if It doesn't appear that way.
Me :	Is This answer sufficient , i.e/ explain the failure of skipping the Thought process , to help You understand ? I will gladly wait for Thine answer.

 

[WanderingWanderer]

I actually understood the math version better heh, hold on, I'll fabricate a response
I'll make myself tea, I feel smart

 

[WanderingWanderer]

There is, in this world, nary a string of words that can truly describe that which I've experienced here in the forums today.
A monolith of the most... thought-provoking ideas one has ever encountered. Senseless gibberish at first and now I stand here and... comprehend it. Je compris! Je peux parler un peu de français, moi chérie, mais je suis trés horrible en le écrit. Je peux lire meilleur, trust me (also, I dont know any other fond name in french besides chérie, so you're stuck with that for now hahah). I very much enjoy feeling shivers and oh by the lords how many you've made me experience. Wow, just wow. I- I am so shocked- in a good way - and proud that I now understand it.

Chat, it all makes sense, chat.

I know myself to be at the top of the popular dunning-kruger effect, there must be something I haven't quite come to grips with yet. Such as the limit of nature's processing power. But for just a few moments I felt pure ecstasy. The amount of dopamine that was released in my brain more than makes up the general lack of serotonin I often feel (Not clinical, merely poetical).
The happiest I've ever felt at once before were 15 minutes of me spouting insane gibberish in english, much to the chagrin of my neighbors. Today? Today was a much more refined, subtle, gentle experience, and as such, it feels as though its lasting effect will be longer. Only time will verify, but this does truly make me want to do so much, to study so much. It makes me want to connect deeply with this world.
I realize I haven't commented on anything, but rather stated my joy over and over. I'll keep it that way. There's many arguments floating around my head right now, many things I could say, but I'll let the dust settle before displaying them.

Thank you, jecrois.

 

[jecroisenlasuperioritedubel]

I dont know any other fond name in french besides chérie, so you're stuck with that for now hahah

Please , raise Your-self ; as even a person as Magnificent - and this is a Massive Under-statement - as You are calling Me close to Them-selves is a badge I shall wear with honour.​

and proud that I now understand it.

As I have said , You are Perfectly capable of understanding - lest You don't , then It is My fault for not being clear , therefore ; be It happening hither or thither , You should always be proud - for You carry the potential , as You are a human naught less nor more.​

The happiest I've ever felt at once ( ... ) I haven't commented on anything, but rather stated my joy over and over​

I am glad to make You feel joy , You don't even have to say Any-thing ; for Thine happiness is enough.

There's many arguments floating around my head right now​

Then please do think about the continuation of My idea hereafter stated , that is : dying , patting , raping , hugging , killing , violating , torturing , lying , acknowledging , rejecting , loving , hating , talking , beating , communicating , assaulting , insulting , praising , & c. are same concepts because they need a reality that is Independent from

to hold meaning Them-selves , however ; remember that what We are experiencing is constructed by

using Our True reality

, so ; please do notice the absence of

in the equation , therefore ; the universe that gave birth to Us , You & Me , is not the Real one , which is a point that's the Main idea throughout This thread - that is to say , I - and by extension , anything in This universe - am not even in control of Mine Own actions , " but " You may say ; " If everything is Your will ; then by dis-agreeing with You , doesn't I show My Own will ? " , and that's what I would call a Weak rebuttal , because We - or rather I , the Only True " False " observer ; which is reversed for You , i.e./ for You , You are the Only True " False " observer - know from My dreams that My will is not happening - e.g./ absence of Lucid dreams Every-time I perform the sleeping action - despite My will is being carried in the dream , as in I am doing something , but because I am the Out-put of My brain - meaning , not a Real person even in the First place ; or simply , consequence of " Independent " - or co-dependent - cortexes , lobes , circuits , & al. interacting at a Large scale - therefore , one can deduce that ; Our Conscious will and Real , hidden , will isn't the Same thing , consequently ; how can We expect a Bigger & Better & Logical

to show My Conscious will , or rather - Non-conscious & Non-existent will of the Wall-clock , while even My Deeper Real will doesn't match with My Faux will , alas ; again , You may say " But You use ' I ' language , and say words that carry the meaning of the speaker carrying an act that depends on Active choice. " and , My Beloved friend , the problem with that argument lies in this : if I called My-self what I think My-self as , i.e/ saying " jecroisenlasuperioritedubel thinks ( ... ) " , then You would have an Harder time to parse what I communicate , because You are still - projecting the act to Me , if We want to express It truly - thinking that You are talking with a person who thinks Their ego is indivisible , alas ; that can't be further away from the truth , meaning - like with Every-thing I , or We , do - I simplify the sentences down to Dialogue levels to have a conversation that is not plagued by understanding , while We delve into reality It-self. I've entertained some debunking by You , sorry for puppeting You herein as These 2 sentences may or may not be what You would think or wouldn't - notwithstanding , let Me return You questions to think about :" If You weren't there to perceive It , i.e/ if You weren't consciousness yet - think being a 1-year-old kid , then how do You know It happened ? If you weren't conscious for It , did It actually " exist " for you - or rather , does It even exist ? If You were conscious since then , what if that was a lie inserted 1 second , or millisecond , or attosecond , or ' Planck-second ' ago by Your Deeper will - or to say in My terms , what

needed to do at that specific moment ? Every-thing - history , causality , identity , permanence - only exists because You assume now connects to a before , but if We go with what I've said so far and assume Every-thing was because

yielded that , at This Very moment - did They , really , happen ? But can They even happen while We don't even have

in Our Real universe ? " and to This question , Mine answer is " We can't trust Our past nor Inherited knowledge nor the understanding of now , because They are False memories that don't even exist in a Real universe in the first place. ".​