@MangaRogue
But it is. Consider China, India, Bangladesh, South Korea, Russia (especially densely populated cities) - people are valued a lot less there than let's say Greenland or New Zealand. And you can clearly note this in the treatment of the people there (you don't need to trust me on that - take a trip there). And this is not some amazing discovery of mine - it's a well known fact that is both biologically and psychologically motivated. People in Japan also used to be treated as slaves to their companies previously (especially during baby booms). And surprise, surprise - since the population started dropping this also changed. It's simple math - you have more people - they are easily replaceable -> lower valued and treated worse. More competition for the same land, work, etc. And no - you do not need an enormous workforce in a developed country especially with the fast advent of neural networks.That is in no way necessarily true.
Until they don't. It may come as a surprise to you but resources are limited. I am not even talking about a breaking point of unsustainability - it's not a binary distinction. Population density and the negative effects of it are a continuous function.Healthy civilizations grow. Healthy organisms grow, and have stable growing populations.