She seemed to react to it and called it expensive right away so she probably got it before.Hmm I wonder, if it's true that she's retracing back tome, does she means she will be retrieving all her precious objects that he gave her before back?
Or is this time loop already different from her past?
That's normal for fountain pen, presidents and directors of companies have one of those kept around for them important signatures as you usually take pictures on those occasions.Damn that's a lot for a pen.
It just seems like such a waste to me. Pointless ostentation.That's normal for fountain pen, presidents and directors of companies have one of those kept around for them important signatures as you usually take pictures on those occasions.
It's kind of the norm at least in asian countries like China and Vietnam though. Although time is changing it is still the major mentality.Man, always disliked the mentality of, "Your money is MY money because we're in a relationship". No, his money is HIS money, unless he decides to share any of it, eg. via a shared bank account for shared expenses, like mortgage or rent, or utilities, or medical issues, and other such shared costs.
I can and always have understood that if there's just one breadwinner in the family, their SO is reliant on them, and there needs to be funds put into a shared expenses setup that they have access to, beyond just necessities; an "allowance", if you must, but consider it a wage for their homekeeping work; if both work, both have their own finances, and should share responsibility for things they share, obviously. But it never should be ALL of their money, ever. That just leads to bad blood between the couple, leading to lower birthrate, higher divorce rate, and so on. Also note that discussions about spending habits are something else entirely; it's perfectly reasonable to remark on behaviours that you see as being detrimental (though should never nag and harp on them).It's kind of the norm at least in asian countries like China and Vietnam though. Although time is changing it is still the major mentality.
Economic circunstances have nothing to do with lower birthrates.I can and always have understood that if there's just one breadwinner in the family, their SO is reliant on them, and there needs to be funds put into a shared expenses setup that they have access to, beyond just necessities; an "allowance", if you must, but consider it a wage for their homekeeping work; if both work, both have their own finances, and should share responsibility for things they share, obviously. But it never should be ALL of their money, ever. That just leads to bad blood between the couple, leading to lower birthrate, higher divorce rate, and so on. Also note that discussions about spending habits are something else entirely; it's perfectly reasonable to remark on behaviours that you see as being detrimental (though should never nag and harp on them).
A quality fountain pen is something that if you take care of it and maintain it properly, you can use it for a lifetime and even pass it on. If I'm going to use something like his long-term, I'd splurge and get something nicer than a $19 Lamy Safari (which is still a nice pen).It just seems like such a waste to me. Pointless ostentation.
That you can say this shows you have no idea of what pressures actually apply to make people decide not to have a kid.Economic ciscunstances have nothing to do with lower birthrates.
Actually it shows you don't know what you are talking about.That you can say this shows you have no idea of what pressures actually apply to make people decide not to have a kid.