Imagine there were two identical twins and they were both marriage prospects. Either of them were willing to spend the rest of their lives with you, and you likewise. They are both equal in every respect except one twin was raped before. Now, moral saints of the comment section, which one would you prefer - the one that was raped before or the one that was never raped?
Let's also talk about "goods" - men are goods. Whenever something life-threatening happens, it is and always will be men who are expected to be the first to confront it. Because men are built for arduous and stressful tasks and because they are simply more expendable in terms of reproduction. But does that mean men, as expendable as they are, are supposed to just sacrifice themselves at the drop of a hat for nothing in return?