Member
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2019
- Messages
- 32
Shizuka now realizing it after hugging Akira multiple times lol.
I don't have the problem with that idea but how it is executed. If the author wants to show Akira's trauma, they can introduce a powerful character/villan that steal from our MC and it will be way more enjoyable to root for Akira to kill him than a little girl trying to survice in the slumI did like this part because it shows Akira is different then most prot. He and Sheryl are both heavily traumatized by their experience at such a young age which effects their decision making. He just doesn't take shit from anybody because he's afraid he will get perceived as weak again which would result in people messing with him. Don't forget that Akira gets target by other thiefs in the WN because he considered an easy mark after this happened. So that's the reason Akira goes to the extreme's he does.
I think you would be a terrible writer then. Because why would a powerful character or villain steal what is practically chump change for the more powerful characters in this world (If I remember the WN correctly she stole like 10.000 Aurum or something)? The people that would resort to stealing money from hunters would have to be either other hunters (but we already had to those villain early on) that are desperate for money because of debts, them thinking its easy pay day or something similar. The only other ppl would be kids/adults that are trying to survive. But as the premise of the book makes clear most adults are either hunters / merchants or part of a gang (im talking about ppl around the slums and outer side of the city). The rest are just young kids that are mostly thief's. Based on your post though it seems to me that you just don't like our protag Akira killing a weak little girl. But personally I like it because its in the tone of the story / setting of Rebuild World which is a eat or be eating kind of world. And showing weakness or making the wrong decision is asking to be killed or taken advantage of.I don't have the problem with that idea but how it is executed. If the author wants to show Akira's trauma, they can introduce a powerful character/villan that steal from our MC and it will be way more enjoyable to root for Akira to kill him than a little girl trying to survice in the slum
I mean they could have thought Akira had way more money in his wallet, there are ways to write it. By having it murdering a smol young female thief over said chump change it does more then just seem overkill. It can make many (and I mean many) readers lose any sympathy/rooting for the MC.I think you would be a terrible writer then. Because why would a powerful character or villain steal what is practically chump change for the more powerful characters in this world (If I remember the WN correctly she stole like 10.000 Aurum or something)? The people that would resort to stealing money from hunters would have to be either other hunters (but we already had to those villain early on) that are desperate for money because of debts, them thinking its easy pay day or something similar. The only other ppl would be kids/adults that are trying to survive. But as the premise of the book makes clear most adults are either hunters / merchants or part of a gang (im talking about ppl around the slums and outer side of the city). The rest are just young kids that are mostly thief's. Based on your post though it seems to me that you just don't like our protag Akira killing a weak little girl. But personally I like it because its in the tone of the story / setting of Rebuild World which is a eat or be eating kind of world. And showing weakness or making the wrong decision is asking to be killed or taken advantage of.
When I say steal I don't mean literally steal the same amount of money of that girl. I mean that that person steal a value thing from Akira like relic, artifact or a reward money for a mission for example. The location may be in the ruin, wastland, etc. There are a bunch of scenerios and situation for the author to create and not just stealing some chump charge by a kid. The more value the ting the more reason we have to kill that personI think you would be a terrible writer then. Because why would a powerful character or villain steal what is practically chump change for the more powerful characters in this world (If I remember the WN correctly she stole like 10.000 Aurum or something)? The people that would resort to stealing money from hunters would have to be either other hunters (but we already had to those villain early on) that are desperate for money because of debts, them thinking its easy pay day or something similar. The only other ppl would be kids/adults that are trying to survive. But as the premise of the book makes clear most adults are either hunters / merchants or part of a gang (im talking about ppl around the slums and outer side of the city). The rest are just young kids that are mostly thief's. Based on your post though it seems to me that you just don't like our protag Akira killing a weak little girl. But personally I like it because its in the tone of the story / setting of Rebuild World which is a eat or be eating kind of world. And showing weakness or making the wrong decision is asking to be killed or taken advantage of.
Then we are still coming back to what I stated before which is that people like yourself and the OG poster that I quoted (which are considered the "mainstream audience") do not like seeing this. And as such they amended it because they knew a bigger audience wouldn't like it. Doesn't change the fact its pretty inline with our protagonist personality and the world this is set in. You just don't like seeing your protag kill a little girl its a simple as that.Theres a reason the LN changed it cause an editor would have seen that and gone "Yeah no change that, it's too dark and will turn readers off" easy fix would be to make the thief a real villain maybe even one of the people that wronged him in the past like that smarmy guy. Then people wouldn't have as much if any issue with it. When you make the victim someone who was like Akira and a young girl just trying to get food money it just comes off major overkill.
If it was a little girl that tried to kill him I'd care less he offed her, the problem is it's over chump change and if it happened and I was reading that for the first time I'd be like "Whelp I'm done with this series the MC is irredeemable in my eyes" it doesn't matter if later he realises he did wrong cause actions cannot be undone.Then we are still coming back to what I stated before which is that people like yourself and the OG poster that I quoted (which are considered the "mainstream audience") do not like seeing this. And as such they amended it because they knew a bigger audience wouldn't like it. Doesn't change the fact its pretty inline with our protagonist personality and the world this is set in. You just don't like seeing your protag kill a little girl its a simple as that.
TrueOn the other hand I'm glad Akira got his money back this quickly, I was so mad reading the previous chapter lol.
Yes, it's not about the author's world, it's about common sense. "terrible writer" is just about the original version, where there is no dilemma or weight of villainy.Then we are still coming back to what I stated before which is that people like yourself and the OG poster that I quoted (which are considered the "mainstream audience") do not like seeing this. And as such they amended it because they knew a bigger audience wouldn't like it. Doesn't change the fact its pretty inline with our protagonist personality and the world this is set in. You just don't like seeing your protag kill a little girl its a simple as that.