“Recent Clerical Events” for manga

“Recent Clerical Events” for manga

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 56.3%
  • I have a different solution (Comment)

    Votes: 7 43.8%

  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .
Group Leader
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
2,733
I see like 10 million “what happened to x chapter?” in MD comment sections per day. I feel like I see these comments and the comments responding to them MORE THAN actual discussion or commentary comments about the manga I feel like there are more of these comments THAN THERE ARE ISEKAI BEING CREATED DAILY.

If we printed out every one of these comments and put it in a box, the density of the box would be greater than the density of male MCs in romance manga

Code:
Current solution:
Discord anti-raid feature but for removing chapters.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 20, 2018
Messages
1,059
People CBA to read sticky topics.
People CBA to read manga description.

Why do you think people will read even more text in description?
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
1,958
Cheat+engine+agreements_169a4f_3268551.jpg
 
Dex-chan HATER
Joined
Mar 17, 2019
Messages
9,997
Cheat+engine+agreements_169a4f_3268551.jpg
^Teddy's image (since he CBA to properly link it)

I +1 this suggestion. I'm guessing this is partially due to the recent Bunyanman situation.
 
Group Leader
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
2,733
@bigtiddyoneesan No, it isn't from the Bunyanman sitch. I have no idea what Bunyanman is. It's just general annoyance.

@BzzBzz Because it's red, it stands out more.
If people CBA to read descriptions then why do so many people trash isekai and otome manga descriptions saying "descriptions sounds like overused revenge/OP MC story"
I see those comments just as often as the people who ask why _ chapters aren't there
 
Dex-chan HATER
Joined
Mar 17, 2019
Messages
9,997
@JustNatsuki
No, it isn't from the Bunyanman sitch. I have no idea what Bunyanman is. It's just general annoyance.
Oh, ok. Thanks for clarifying.

Hypothetically, if a group removed its chapters from MD for 'dramatic' reasons, and the red bold explanation text just said "removed at the request of uploader/[groupname]" without a further explanation (to prevent more 'drama' and stay impartial), how much do you think that would prevent people from asking about the actual reason for removal?

^I'm just talking about this scenario specifically. Other explanations as to why a chapter was removed (like "didn't follow rule x") would be helpful.
 
Custom title
VIP
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
2,795
@JustNatsuki Without shooting down the suggestion immediately, there are a few issues this specific implementation suggestion would run into from my perspective.

First off, there's the problem of how we're supposed to frame notices like this. Just like bigtiddyoneesan mentioned, if we just go "removed at the request of the group" as neutrally as possible, that's not really going to address the issue of people asking "well what was the cause" - in fact, it'll most likely just make people even more curious and annoying about it; but if we start adding context, we'd inevitably frame it from MD's perspective which the groups in question could reasonably object to. We could allow them to add their input as well, but in the end we'd need to agree to actually publicize it in case someone would rather just take the opportunity to rant or include external links/ads or whatever.
tl;dr - I don't see how there's a both fair and informative way to do it.

Second, and this is more minor, but we don't really want to include scanlation-specific information in the manga information table. The only one there currently is the "total chapters" count and I don't think it's really even necessary, we'll probably remove it in v5. Writing the events in eye-catching red text just makes things even more annoying. I could possibly see this implemented as a tab alongside Chapters, Comments and Covers, but obviously that would limit its immediate visibility which seems to be the exact opposite of what's being suggested here.

Frankly, though, since this issue seems to specifically be about people who post comments without wanting to read through a thread, it seems to me that writing this info in a pinned post on top of the thread in question would probably do the job well enough (though the framing issue would remain). We'd need to work on the forums to implement such a functionality, though.
 
Group Leader
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
2,733
@Teasday Thanks for the reply.

First off, there's the problem of how we're supposed to frame notices like this.
There is NOTHING we can do about people asking further questions, but that's not a reason to not provide any information at all. I'd argue that the number of people that would ask for the cause is less than the number of people that would ask about removed chapters in the first place. Even if that difference is 20 people, it's still less spam than we have now.

Like I can't solve world hunger or homelessness by myself, but I would rather volunteer at the food bank than not help at all (and I have.)

in the end we'd need to agree to actually publicize it in case someone would rather just take the opportunity to rant or include external links/ads or whatever.
That's where the idea of a New User level like Helper comes in. If a Helper chooses to add external links, they'd lose that role.

Second, and this is more minor, but we don't really want to include scanlation-specific information in the manga information table.
Isn't this kind of counterintuitive since... Mangadex is a scanlation hosting site?

Code:
A different solution:
When groups request to take down chapters, is it a DM to a site moderator? We could systematically create just 1 chapter in the "Chapters" tab with a single screenshot of the group's removal request, as well as telling users to contact the group if they want a reason. Example Title: "Ch. 1 - Ch. 45: README: Why were these chapters removed?"
This would solve the further questions problem while also having some level of visibility; if readers want to read earlier chapters they've gotta see that.


it seems to me that writing this info in a pinned post on top of the thread in question would probably do the job well enough
And yeah, pins would be a great solution; I'm just trying to find a quick-n-easy solution.

@bigtiddyoneesan Answered your question above.
 
Mangodex Derailer Wheezer
Group Leader
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Messages
8,046
@JustNatsuki
If role as a volunteer i disagree since it's not like baka-updates, but this
Example Title: "Ch. 1 - Ch. 45: README: Why were these chapters removed?"
and this
it seems to me that writing this info in a pinned post on top of the thread in question would probably do the job well enough.
i agree, and the pinned post would be like the "planned thread"
as you can see, there's a bunch of suggestion without looking the planned first.....
 
Custom title
VIP
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
2,795
@JustNatsuki posted:

That's where the idea of a New User level like Helper comes in. If a Helper chooses to add external links, they'd lose that role.
We already have Contributors. Anyway, I was talking specifically about the group's official response to our explanation for why their chapters are down being included in the same post. If we don't allow them to present their side, we'd be manipulative assholes just trying to look good in a bad situation, but at the same time we obviously can't allow them to take advantage of us and post just anything in retaliation. Where would the line be? I don't see how there are good choices here.

Isn't this kind of counterintuitive since... Mangadex is a scanlation hosting site?
It's a design choice. The manga table is for presenting information about the manga itself. Scanlation isn't manga. With how we allow various groups to upload alternate chapters, in multiple languages, it doesn't make sense to include "official" manga information about something one specific group in one specific language did or didn't do. It's partly why we don't have a "scanlation status" field either.
 
Group Leader
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
2,733
@Teasday
If we don't allow them to present their side, we'd be manipulative assholes just trying to look good in a bad situation
The thing is, they're always allowed to present their side, but frequently they don't want to. None of these suggestions would prevent them from presenting their side. They're always allowed to make a new account and post in the comment section. I don't know where you're getting the idea that this will prevent them from presenting their side.

MD will at some point have to make a stand/give a position. Just like with the JBox situation. There was a forum post about the situation which presented the problem from MD's perspective. JBox's side was not presented in that same first post. If they don't put an official response on MD, there's nothing you can do.

The chapter solution solves all those concerns. Just make a simple form like MD has with the report function, have groups select from a list of reasons why they want their chapters to be removed, and then upload a screenshot of that as a chapter in the manga in that specific language.
 
Dex-chan HATER
Joined
Mar 17, 2019
Messages
9,997
@JustNatsuki posted:
That's where the idea of a New User level like Helper comes in. If a Helper chooses to add external links, they'd lose that role.
I don't know enough about how the MD staff operates to know how beneficial these 'Helpers' would be to lightening workload, etc., but I think that creating another level of 'pseudo-staff' for something like this would be a step in the wrong direction, particularly due to the fact that a single addition to the site would rely on an influx of new 'pseudo-staff' to function smoothly and fairly.
@Tuesday posted:
Where would the line be? I don't see how there are good choices here.
^I think this is the biggest issue here. The framing of removal reasons is important. I believe that keeping the reasons as objective as possible would prevent the most future headaches. But to ensure objectivity would require limiting the reasons uploaders could give for removal. Uploaders could present their sides on group pages, forum posts, and their own websites/discord servers.

Edit (lol): As I was typing this I refreshed and saw JustNatsuki's above post. I was actually just about to type something like this:
have groups select from a list of reasons why they want their chapters to be removed
^This would indeed keep the reasons clear, concise, and most importantly, objective.

As for where the actual "reason text" would show up, I suggest just having a mouseover icon next to the titles of unavailable chapters, and said icon would display the selected reason for removal. That way, removal reasons would only be viewable by users that have 'Unavailable chapters' toggled to show.
 
Group Leader
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
2,733
@bigtiddyoneesan The problem with mouseover text is that it's really only seeable on Desktop and some Android devices (I'd say a good 40% of my activity here is from an Apple mobile device). IMO just putting the reason text in the title is a lot more direct.
 
Dex-chan HATER
Joined
Mar 17, 2019
Messages
9,997
@JustNatsuki
True. Mouseover text doesn't have to be the final product. I think it would be best for the info to stay optional though, to prevent it from cluttering up the title text. Maybe a dropdown like with spoiler tags?
 
Custom title
VIP
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
2,795
@JustNatsuki posted:

They're always allowed to make a new account and post in the comment section. I don't know where you're getting the idea that this will prevent them from presenting their side.
Sure, but we've been talking about like a single, specific notice post, preferably a short one, not a comment section full of arguments which I thought was the entire point of your suggestion in the first place. New accounts aren't even necessary, we're specifically not talking about people who have been banned but who just don't want uploads on the site.

MD will at some point have to make a stand/give a position.
This entire suggestion revolves around the complaint that people keep posting questions about missing chapters instead of spending 5 minutes investigating themselves, so it's basically just about sating people's curiosity. There's no "stand" to be made here. We're not talking about, like, debates that MangaDex has yet to reveal their position on or whatever, it's usually just groups getting frustrated with us for various reasons, be they personal grievances due to getting moderated, disagreements over what kind of content is allowed on the site, and so on. Even saying this probably reveals how obviously biased towards ourselves writing such notices would be. All groups that left on their own are welcome back anytime they want, provided they adhere to our rules, so we don't want to be aggravating them further for no real benefit.

And I don't understand why it's so hard to succinctly state the facts without bias.
Understandable, but this is how reporting always has worked. You can state nothing but verifiable facts all day, but the framing - including which facts you state and which you leave out - has everything to do with the intent and interpretation of the report. The entire process is inherently biased. In any case, this is veering a bit too into the philosophical side of things so I better stop before it goes too off topic.

And the chapter solution solves all those concerns. Just make a simple form like MD has with the report function, have groups select from a list of reasons why they want their chapters to be removed, and then upload a screenshot of that as a chapter in the manga in that specific language.
To begin with, groups and uploaders are free to delete their chapters on their own whenever and for whatever reason they feel like, so this report thing would just make things more convoluted than necessary. Plenty of people delete their chapters for many reasons besides wanting to quit MD (and then possibly immediately reupload them). Coming up with a list of possible reasons would be both long and uncomprehensive.

Not to mention I just don't like the idea of having a massive dump of dummy chapters all just saying they're deleted, and I seriously doubt the vast majority of the userbase would appreciate it either.

I feel like you're too focused on what the haters may think without realizing that haters are always gonna hate, no matter what you do. The more mature members of the community will support you in your decisions.
First off, that's demonstrably false since we have indeed had people quit and come back. There are haters who aren't always gonna hate. Second, and since we're talking about maturity, I'm less focused on what the haters may think as I am on having to design and develop features frankly only because annoyingly many overly curious people would rather write questions than read answers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top