Rettou Gan no Tensei Majutsushi ~ Shiitagerareta Moto Yuusha wa Mirai no Sekai o Yoyuu de Ikinuku ~ - Vol. 5 Ch. 34

[Rzelux]

Typical shounen manga.
It was a good thing at the moment when he decide to kill him, and then the resurection scene ruin it..

 

[shanoc5902]

@Fwaifuxsenpai I think this series has a better story too, but I think the demon king one had better characters. Notably the MC there had a distinct personality and when he won over girls to his side he helped resolve a deep long running and nuanced problem that was afflicting them that fit well into the world, while here the MC has an emotional range that feels like he is watching paint dry all the time and often has the story hand him overused and cheap scenarios to save the girls to make them fall in love with him, rather than it being something that plays into their own character development as well.

That said, the demon king story runs into other problems like how he openly flaunts his God-like powers but people rarely take him seriously, here The MC is actively hiding his God-like powers so it makes sense that only his inner circle and one observant teacher have clued in on his abilities to varying extents.

 

[Eplayer]

thanks for the chapter

 

[GerryCeryBery]

Imagine him morphing back into human form without his underwear! That would be so logical it wouldn't make any sense in this manga.

 

[Dekisugee]

@GerryCeryBery his cock would rub his back bruh

 

[weeabootrash]

@Red225 You understand there's probability, right? If in the Batman universe, 50% of all Arkham Asylum prisoners escape within a year, and have an average of murdering 10 people before they're caught again, that's called a liability. Hypothetically, if Batman killed them all, and there was just some "evil god" who revived them literally within 24 hours of dying, then it would also be a liability. But where the fuck is the evil god in batman nigga? Sure, prisoners can escape from jail irl and then cause problems, but what are the CHANCES of that happening. If this protagonist didn't have almost omnipotent powers already, as he said the only way to save him would be to kill him, and that'd be that. There would be no reason just to "capture and secure" this spider creature thing that a demon is possessing if there's only liability involved.

 

[Red225]

@weeabootrash In the batman universe reviving someone is literally as easy as throwing them into the Lazarus Pits of Ra's al Ghul, or getting revived as undead monsters by the Black Lantern Rings, or revived by the White Lantern corps, or half a dozen other methods.

Does that make killing all the arkham asylum prisoners a good idea? It might reduce the recidivism rate, but may also cause angry zombies to start rising out of the ground, and I could tell you that if ever there was a run where Batman started murdering people the death toll will end up higher than anything the criminals would have killed, simply because it's a comic book and they have hamhanded morals.

Back on this comic, though. Killing someone who's restrained is STILL murder. It just so happens that murder is the correct solution here, and murder is much less problematic if you can resurrect someone instantly.

BUT IT'S STILL MURDER AND YOU'D NEED TO EXPLAIN IT IF IT'S FOUND OUT. Until someone puts an amendment into the law, to say something like "if you stop someone's heart for medical purposes and then revive them, that isn't murder", it's still going to be murder.

-Having said that, any such case would probably lead to a landmark decision being given to say "no, that literally isn't murder" which would lead to case law updating the definition of murder to exclude this fringe scenario.

 

[weeabootrash]

@Red225 You completely ignored the point about probability and liability. Then you bring up other DC universe characters, when I'm solely talking about Batman.
The man was possessed by a demon, who under normal circumstances was completely unable to be brought back. That means he's a dangerous, supernatural being that is NOT EVEN A CONSCIOUS HUMAN. It's like killing an animal at that point. But please, continue describing how killing a spider demon man is such a horrible idea.

 

[Fox_Sama]

Letting Bass live isn't going to go well...

 

[Seraphus]

The big panels in this manga make the chapters seem short, lol...

Seems like maybe a weird flex to kill him and then revive him, but I can see that it's easier to do that than to explain that he's killed tons of people and one more won't bother him.
Killing a person and showing no sign of caring will ABSOLUTELY get you talked about, and create lots and lots of questions; claiming you hurt somebody (perhaps severely) and then healed them just makes you look like a magical genius... which is how he is already regarded.

 

[Red225]

@weeabootrash you literally asked where the "evil god is" in Batman in your last post. Ra's al Ghul is one of Batman's archnemesis, and his Lazarus pits bring people back to life. And Batman's fought all of the other folks like the Black Lantern Corps and the like. They're his enemies.

They would bring back people from the dead to fuck with Batman, just like how someone might release prisoners from Arkham Asylum.

Back to the point!
If you shoot someone to death, even in self defense, you're likely to end up in court. Does that mean what you did is wrong? Probably not! But you're still going to end up in court, because you've ended someone's life and that's going to likely need people to investigate.

And if you walk into a mental asylum with a shotgun in your hand, announce "I WILL NOW START ENDING THESE INSANE PEOPLE'S LIVES" and go into the room of some poor criminally insane person's bed then blow his brains out with a gun, then magically revive him without his insanity, YOU'RE STILL LIKELY TO GET CHARGED WITH MURDER. That's just the law. Even if you're absolutely justified in doing so.

Now, if you instead explain yourself and say "hey I've got a revolutionary new medical procedure that can help cure people of their criminal insanities, but it's a bit bloody" before blowing people's heads off and painting the walls with their blood, you're much less likely to get accused of murder. Isn't that amazing?

 

[Demathraxyus]

@Red225 Red, you're arguing with a man who named himself after his own personality, its not really worth it at this point.

 

[Red225]

Fair enough, fair enough!

 

[weeabootrash]

@Red225 The evil god question was rhetorical. I don't know about all of DC lore, nor do I care. I was simply talking about Batman and Gotham. The fucking DC universe is a convoluted mess.

Secondly, you still ignore the point I'm making, likely for clear reason. I'm not arguing about the process of it. I'm not arguing about the legality of it. I'm arguing about the morality of it.

In the hypothetical situation based on the real world, let's say there is an insane serial killer developed abilities with superhuman strength to be able to escape from jail without any repercussion but was somehow caught time and time again, but only after murdering people. Every time he's put in jail, he comes back out to murder others (as well as the people in the jail). The government has no ability to stop his escape from jail, nor any specific way to detain him. What do you do? You fucking kill him.

@Demathraxyus Yeah totally not since I thought it was a funny name. Same with you, clearly you're a 14 year old edgy kid who thought a bunch of latin sounding words together would be cool.

 

[Mangon]

lame and stupid

 

[MangoCo]

Obvious cliffhanger is obvious

 

[alannondarklord]

"The quiet days are coming to an end..?"
o_0
Series, when have you ever been quiet? If you're claiming to be slice of life, those are some very thin slices.

 

[Simpleton]

"Only death can end this contract/bond! Mwahahaha!"

*Kills*
*Resurrects*
*Problem solved*

 

[Daphine]

The story is interesting although the art is not very meticulous but it's acceptable.

 

[Nep]

@alannondarklord lol. The only thing I could think of after reading your sentence is whether I've had thinner potato chips and sashimi.