Introduce a love triangle, please 🙏its super good i am invested in this please dont introduce a love triangle thats my only request
ML is a loser
At least the author is exploring how that actually impacts the story. Writing an annoying character is one thing - actually thinking through the consequences of that is usually good writing.ML is a loser
ML is a loser
Kareshi Tokidoki Kanojo for me instead.No wonder the art style seems so familiar, its the same author of Koi to uso.
If you're missing the last bit of information to get interested:blah blah blah I ain't reading ts that summary itself is pissing me off. Wait, why am I even here?
you too
The woman explicitly said that he isn't the most attractive guy. She also said that she can't stand romances that are based solely on physical attraction and lack character. What do you expect from the male lead here??? Only a fool would think they’re making the best move here. Please point out to me in these two chapters, where the two have surely known each other for over a month, all the signs the woman gives showing she’s interested in him. Exactly two times where she explicitly tries to make it look like an “accident.” She’s essentially trying the same thing as the male lead, but as sexual harassment (the male lead is trying to win her over through common ground and respect). Imagine if the roles were reversed and the woman pretended she wasn’t sexually attracted to the man, and the man tried to make intense physical contact “accidentally.” The man would immediately be labeled a perverted asshole. Yet here, the storyteller calling them "two perverts", even though the ML wasn’t trying to be perverted and no one mentions that here, even though it’s obvious.
It's a shame that sexism is still so prevalent in today's society