I see a lot of feels in this thread, from both sides. The entire OP is built on assumptions and hurt feelings.
What I would like to see to at least try and understand what the hell is happening, as a reader, is the answer to these questions, from both sides:
[ul]How does it benefit scanlation groups, exactly?
How does it benefit readers, exactly?
How does it benefit MD, exactly?
How does it benefit shitty scan aggregators, exactly?
How does it hurt scanlation groups and how it is justified?
How does it hurt readers and how it is justified?
How does it hurt MD and how it is justified?
How does it hurt shitty scan aggregators and how it is justified?[/ul]
Right now, as I see, the answers to those are "it hurts our pride so it's OK". What I see here is just a lack of proper evaluation. Even if scanlation groups service is "free and selfless", this is not a reason to upset the entire scene. Seems like someone just lost their way in the process, or there's some third party sowing seeds of stupid conflict.
What I would like to see to at least try and understand what the hell is happening, as a reader, is the answer to these questions, from both sides:
[ul]How does it benefit scanlation groups, exactly?
How does it benefit readers, exactly?
How does it benefit MD, exactly?
How does it benefit shitty scan aggregators, exactly?
How does it hurt scanlation groups and how it is justified?
How does it hurt readers and how it is justified?
How does it hurt MD and how it is justified?
How does it hurt shitty scan aggregators and how it is justified?[/ul]
Right now, as I see, the answers to those are "it hurts our pride so it's OK". What I see here is just a lack of proper evaluation. Even if scanlation groups service is "free and selfless", this is not a reason to upset the entire scene. Seems like someone just lost their way in the process, or there's some third party sowing seeds of stupid conflict.