@firosahoge
Yeah, the premise of the manga was already blowing past morality with the animal girls looking like humans and the males looking like animals.
I don't have an issue with the immorality of any of it, just the ways it ridiculously stretches my suspension of disbelief. (How do the mole rats reproduce when the males barely come up to the ankles of the one female we've seen? WHAT ABOUT THE FUCKING ORCAS? IF THEIR FEMALES ARE THE SIZE OF THE BELUGA WHALE GIRL, HOW DO THEY NOT RIP THEM IN HALF?)
We all know the real reason why the female cast are hot chicks with animal ears, maybe tails, and
perhaps some sort of distinguishing nose or other feature. I don't think the best artist in the world could do sexy fanservice with a real giant panda.
Calling it immoral is also pretty rich from someone with the username "Firo's ahoge". 😁
Then the animals sexually abuse each other
What grinds my gears is stuff like the Impala Tournament, where it's clear cut in the narration that these are dominance displays to attract a harem of potential mates.
Then King wins his match, and states that he wants to fuck the impala that's attracted to him, and her parents... ...kick him into the stratosphere because apparently this whole event wasn't a giant impala mating display between males to get some tail (as the narrator explicitly declared it was) and we're suddenly playing by modern human rules again? You know, in a series where King at one point had an entire pride of lionesses serving (and presumably screwing) him because he had the largest mane. And that was just a thing.
I mean, I'm enjoying the series (mostly because I'm not taking it too seriously), but it's being hilariously inconsistent about what set of rules it's playing by at any given moment in time. That seems to sabotage the comedy a bit in many cases, simply because you can't get that nice, hard punchline reversal out of a gag unless there is some expectation to be subverted. By this point, I expect we'll play by animal rules or human (well, actually "super sensitive/dumb" romcom manga) rules depending on which progresses any relationship the least amount possible.
I doubt they'd do anything that puts them on shaky legal grounds
Given that Akumetsu exists, I don't think anybody cares. (If you don't know, Akumetsu was a series in which the eponymous protagonist brutally slaughtered his way through
extremely thinly disguised caricatures of real Japanese politicians and business figures the author decided were to blame for Japan's generally rotten state, with the MC mouthing off about their guilt for historical incidents and administering sadistic but deliciously ironic punishments. It's a great series, and it's completed.)
This kinda work is your typical pioneer work to desensitize everyone to a new immoral trend (furries in this case).
Beastars is going to be a much better ambassador for that cause, because it's actually got consistent and well-thought-out worldbuilding around the whole animal instinct thing and how a world of anthros could work - and what the problems would be. It's even got premarital
handholding sex without much in the way of feelings attached - when was the last time you saw
that in a manga? Seriously, Beastars is everything this manga could be if it wanted to be taken seriously. (Which it doesn't, and that's fine, and, despite my complaints, I'm still enjoying it.)
I think Kodomo no Jikan was one of the mainstream pioneers of that.
Oh, god, why'd you have to bring that up? I
think it was pioneered before that, but that series is one of the reasons Demi-chan, despite its fairly wholesome concept and generally good execution, leaves a bad taste in my mouth.