Aggregator gang
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2019
- Messages
- 280
Everyone talking about marriage, and me here wondering if the 'we'll be ready to take your commission anytime!!' also implies that Kanako's friend is also a hitman
I'm 18 (when I said "we" I wasn't referring to older women, just women in general). 18 is too old for your tastes? Should I be calling Chris Hansen?No problem. I don't want your kind of women anyway. Too old for my tastes.
As someone in the 18-24 year age range, I'm telling you that we don't want you. Why would we want older men when men don't want older women, apparently? We'd be going for the 18-24 range too. Literally none of my friends are interested in older men, either. In the past, women were attracted to older men because they provided a sense of stability. But now that it is obvious that we are just as capable of making our own money, there's no reason for that. Rather, I think you're the naive one for thinking we're into people your age, lmao.How naive. Men of your age range will rather go for the 18-24 year olds instead. I thought I already covered this.
I'm not talking about fertility. I'm talking about "beauty," as you put it. Obviously, this applies to men, too. 18-24 year old women are not going to find your age range as attractive as men their age. So, the dating pool for single men at in the 30+ range is just as limited as women in the 30+ range. I don't understand your argument.It's not the same. Men can still produce sperm (albeit at a much lower rate) even up to their 70s.
Then just ignore me.I dont even want to hear your arguments existence. Its that dumb.
I'm 24 by the way, and it really doesn't matter for me since I was never interested in starting a family.As someone in the 18-24 year age range, I'm telling you that we don't want you.
Sigh, that's not the point. Men and women value different things.But now that it is obvious that we are just as capable of making our own money, there's no reason for that.
Again, no it doesn't. Women's beauty declines drastically with age compared to men. Try comparing Brad Pitt with any actresses around his age.I'm not talking about fertility. I'm talking about "beauty," as you put it. Obviously, this applies to men, too.
Here's Tomi Lahren complaining that men are trash for preferring 19-21 year olds over her 28 years old assAlthough it appears certain people are still stuck in the caveman era.
That was in response of her saying "I don't want your kind of men anyway" to me, but whatever.Going all "No problem. I don't want your kind of women anyway"
You'd be surprised.as if any woman would want them back in the first place.
First you call me an incel, and then you say I have sex with prostitutes. I don't think you understand what celibacy means.Furn_ace, dude, come back when you don't have to pay for sex.
Yeah, sure. Remember back when women want "sensitive men who are more in touch with their femininity"?maybe listen to what actual women are telling you about themselves
There are plenty of females who look amazing despite their age--Jennifer Lopez, Halle Berry, etc (and both of them are Brad Pitt's age). You're just picking specific cases that support your argument and making generalizations that you can't support. It's true, both men and women lose beauty when they grow old (sorry, dude, you're not some kind of an exception to time!), so it's kind of stupid to have that as your main standard when you're choosing a partner.Women's beauty declines drastically with age compared to men. Try comparing Brad Pitt with any actresses around his age.
Nice generalization. Maybe stop projecting your ideals and stereotypes onto entire genders.Women value provision and protection. Men value someone that can take care of him, his children, and his home.
Ah, yes. "Value." Because that's what matters in a relationship, right?A working woman has way less time for him, his children, and his home, so her value to him plummets.
Again, you seem to think that everyone wants the same thing from life. There are women who want a career first, and then a family. And that's fine, there's no need to be bitter about it. And no, women who don't get married between 18-24 are not going to end up like Tomi LMAO. We don't hate men, we're just focusing on other things at the moment. Meanwhile, Tomi is just straight-up a misandrist. But are you, a misogynist, really any better than her?The wall is real, whether you acknowledge it or not. If you're truly 18, then it is better for you to heed my advice. Otherwise you'll end up like her.
Duh. I never said they stayed the same.Men's look declined with age too.
First of all, you need to get your eyes checked. They can still score women in their 20s, so you're obviously wrong there. You don't see actresses in their 50s scoring men in their 20s, do you?You think Brad Pitt looks good? He and Leonardo DiCaprio look ugly as hell now compared to when they were young
Why can't you name any, then?while there are women who still look beautiful and sexy at 50s
Here's a wikipedia page on age disparity between heterosexual married couples.You said "men are programmed to seek younger women" then where is your proof?
I already covered this. Why men won't dump their wives :By your logic, then all married men will dump their wives to seek for someone younger because their wives are old and ugly now?
Yeah, sure. Go ahead and completely ignore the risk of birth defects of late pregnancies.Fertility isn't much of a problem anymore since there are women in their 60s still capable of giving birth than to medical advance now.
You're attacking me personally now, but I'm somehow the immature one. Oh the irony🤣So you are 24. No wonder your way of thinking is so immature. Guys like you is why women seek older men. You are still a kid that hasn't known life yet.
Strawman argument. I never said men are not going to lose their looks when they age.It's true, both men and women lose beauty when they grow old (sorry, dude, you're not some kind of an exception to time!)
That's how it is since the ancient times. You might not like it, but it's true.Nice generalization. Maybe stop projecting your ideals and stereotypes onto entire genders.
Why of course. Relationship involves exchanges to begin, and to continue to work.Ah, yes. "Value." Because that's what matters in a relationship, right?
Yes, she became a misandrist because her target men are ignoring her in favor of younger women.Meanwhile, Tomi is just straight-up a misandrist.
So every man you disagree with is a misogynist. Okay. Feminism 101.But are you, a misogynist, really any better than her?
Nope, only in the ancient times. Since YOUR mind is stuck in the "ancient times," this might be how you think. But no, not all women and men think the same way. You're imposing your stereotypes onto entire groups of people.That's how it is since the ancient times. You might not like it, but it's true.
So you think every woman who gets ignored by their target men are going to become misandrists? And that every women who doesn't get a man by thirty is going to get ignored by their age group for the rest of their lives? I know several people in real life who can completely disprove that theory. Once again, you're using your own experiences to speak for an entire group of people.Yes, she became a misandrist because her target men are ignoring her in favor of younger women.
Um, no? Literally everything that you've said so far has either had sexist undertones or is blatantly sexist. Yes, women who make everything about sexism are bad, but men who deny sexism right in front of their faces are just as bad. You've had multiple people in this comment thread tell you that, so why don't you just get the point? But sure, "boo hoo liberals make everything about feminism waa waa feminism bad."So every man you disagree with is a misogynist. Okay. Feminism 101.