the writting is kinda generic, with the usual I can't let you get away with evil even if it your way is more efficient can saves the world in the end. It just seems like poor writing for me, he's seen countless injustices get through and is still preaching about how he wants to save a world that lets it happen day by day when people with the power to bring it about are too scared about the consequences to do anything. Just makes it seem a bit pathetic imo, i get its just bare bones writing but kinda makes him saving anything feel pointless in the end.I can't help but feel something is off about them adding in all these horrible things people were allowed to get away with without punishment now. Like it almost weakens the MCs reason for wanting to give up after being betrayed at the start if he was facing this kind of bullshit the entire time. Would've been of a "Them too?" kind of deal if it was always like this, but that doesn't feel like what happened.
My problem is the MC let them go, like sure the nobel did some good but what happens when he has to get more medicine or something else for his family. He'll do more bad.I can't help but feel something is off about them adding in all these horrible things people were allowed to get away with without punishment now. Like it almost weakens the MCs reason for wanting to give up after being betrayed at the start if he was facing this kind of bullshit the entire time. Would've been of a "Them too?" kind of deal if it was always like this, but that doesn't feel like what happened.
Yeah makes no sense. Basically if you do enough good you're allowed to do crime. He should have let the village decide the chief's fate, the city the nobles and so on. Let the people hear their crimes and if they think it's fine to allow them to do such acts then let them live as they are a lost cause and can't cry to him when it comes back to bite them.My problem is the MC let them go, like sure the nobel did some good but what happens when he has to get more medicine or something else for his family. He'll do more bad.
Its retarded writing as noone in that city would let the nobel live.
Also the village chief, son and other killer should have been struck down by MC. Rediculous that they got off scot free cause "their word was law"
Indeed, whether law is good or evil, it operationalizes as law exactly and only because of the power of those who enforce it. Anyone more powerful can replace one set of laws with another.Rediculous that they got off scot free cause "their word was law"
Like what is even the purpose of the MC if he "can't" do things cause "People in charge can do what they want or did a good deed at some point" it just makes me dislike the MC cause he let bad things continue.Indeed, whether law is good or evil, it operationalizes as law exactly and only because of the power of those who enforce it. Anyone more powerful can replace one set of laws with another.
In any case, this story utterly lacks cleverness of any sort.
This is what I mentioned in my comment on the previous chapter.the writting is kinda generic, with the usual I can't let you get away with evil even if it your way is more efficient can saves the world in the end. It just seems like poor writing for me, he's seen countless injustices get through and is still preaching about how he wants to save a world that lets it happen day by day when people with the power to bring it about are too scared about the consequences to do anything. Just makes it seem a bit pathetic imo, i get its just bare bones writing but kinda makes him saving anything feel pointless in the end.
On another note, I don't agree with the way Shion probably handled things, but I understand his stance as a character. Remember that a character is an attempt to create a "person". The better it is written, the more we "like" it. As such, it's not exactly poor writing, at least in this specific case.
that's why its a badly written story imo, he's written to be lawful good at all times and ignores all the suffering he or anyone else goes through with its just that way. I'm not saying it's impossible to write a good character that way but like at some point people just feel detached, and that he's just a simple minded boring gary stu character who exists for the author to have a plot. He's been betrayed, left to die, watched innocent civilians get murdered with their culprits getting away with it scot free because of their positions and is still going on about how he'll never side with evil.This is what I mentioned in my comment on the previous chapter.
Our society has come to hate itself, almost every ideology nowadays in fundamentally misanthropic.
Thanos was one of the most recent characters that embody this madness, and there are people that kinda agree with him. Efficient.
On another note, I don't agree with the way Shion probably handled things, but I understand his stance as a character. Remember that a character is an attempt to create a "person". The better it is written, the more we "like" it. As such, it's not exactly poor writing, at least in this specific case. He just embodies a quite common way of thinking. For example, I've heard and read many, many people that justify a president or political party because the previous ones in charge "stole more". People who receive food aid from criminal organizations and even cover for them because of those "aids".
In the little fragment, Shion is thinking in the same way millions of people do.
And in addition to this, a main character does have to be likable, relatable or interesting, so that readers follow the story, but not perfect. It's quite common to see protagonist have a flawed view on something, so, at least in my case, I don't particularly feel anything to this stance of his (aside from disagreeing with it) nor does it make dislike him as a character.