Taida na Akujoku Kizoku ni Tensei shita Ore, Scenario wo Bukkowashitara Kikakugai no Maryoku de Saikyou ni Natta - Ch. 7 - The Results of Reformation

Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Feb 9, 2018
Messages
13
Thanks for telling me! It’s always good to know what’s happening before pointing fingers and such.
The translators are very cool then, because it seems (at least in my view) that the chapters release very 1-2 MONTHS, being able to remember and not give up on a very slow releasing series is very awesome of them. I give my thanks 👍
The manga was on break to prepare for the physical volume release. The new chapter just come out a day ago I believe.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Oct 30, 2023
Messages
157
Quick question: does this series just release slowly or do the translators not have enough time to translate this?
There are no new raws, so there's nothing to translate either yet.
It is probably slow to come out then.
Now there was more than enough time for the translators it's been almost a week since chap 8 released I'm not mad I'm just saying
Coz we r getting these translated for free so what more could we ask for
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 11, 2019
Messages
2,134
Me me me waaa look at me I consume real protein meat
Mangadex best people
 
Group Leader
Joined
Jul 5, 2023
Messages
366
You should rethink that. Arsenic trioxide is a common rat poison.

https://www.fda.gov/food/environmental-contaminants-food/arsenic-food

Yes, but I'm taking about food producers intentionally adding rat poison, not rat poison getting in food through negligence. Anything could get in the food through negligence. Just look up people recounting the gross shit they found in their food.

Federal Regulations​

There are no FDA regulations that authorize arsenic for use as a color additive or food additive. The FDA seeks to limit the amount of arsenic in foods when it is not otherwise possible to prevent arsenic entirely.

It is the legal responsibility of companies that grow or produce foods, or manufacture products intended for use with foods sold in the U.S., to comply with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and FDA’s regulations.

If the FDA determines that the level of arsenic causes the food to be unsafe, the agency will take regulatory action. This may include working with the manufacturer to resolve the issue, and as necessary, taking steps to prevent the product from entering, or remaining, in the U.S. market.
- From the page you linked me.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Sep 27, 2023
Messages
369
Yes, but I'm taking about food producers intentionally adding rat poison, not rat poison getting in food through negligence. Anything could get in the food through negligence. Just look up people recounting the gross shit they found in their food.


- From the page you linked me.
Actually, what you said was:

"Rat poison is never added stealthily to food, so I'm confident I'll never ingest it."

I'm just pointing out that your confidence is woefully misplaced. You're ingesting it from tons of different sources and it's a much, much bigger issue than soy.

If you have any lingering doubts, I'd suggest googling "Is soy dangerous?" and then "Is arsenic dangerous?" The science is pretty one-sided.
 
Group Leader
Joined
Jul 5, 2023
Messages
366
Actually, what you said was:

"Rat poison is never added stealthily to food, so I'm confident I'll never ingest it."

I'm just pointing out that your confidence is woefully misplaced. You're ingesting it from tons of different sources and it's a much, much bigger issue than soy.

If you have any lingering doubts, I'd suggest googling "Is soy dangerous?" and then "Is arsenic dangerous?" The science is pretty one-sided.

I guess quality control for food in the United States is so bad that you can never have confidence in anything you eat, huh.

Also, don't assume what food I ingest. My confidence comes with the asterisk that I already know what to avoid. Though my limited food choice is more due to the fact that I'm a carnivore, so I only buy the best quality of raw meat I can find (and other unprocessed products of animal origin) and cook it myself.

In terms of food quality, I could only do better if I move to the countryside and raise my own livestock.

And before you say "But animal products also contain arsenic!", sure, but it's in even lower quantities than typical produce. At least in first world countries, where the regulations are strict.

Remember, it's not the presence of a substance that determines its danger, but how much of it you're exposed to.

What I mean by "Rat poison is never added stealthily to food, so I'm confident I'll never ingest it." is that I'm confident that the dose of any potentially harmful substance won't be high enough to be considered "poison".

The issue with soy is that since it's considered "mostly safe" by the regulatory bodies, there's no legal upper limit to how much a manufacturer can add.

And with potentially adverse effects from prolonged intake of soy being somewhat researched... The science isn't one-sided (since I know for a fact some of the studies claiming "soy is good for you" were funded by entities that are trying to promote soy, but that's another topic), but it's better to avoid it entirely just to be safe.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Sep 27, 2023
Messages
369
I guess quality control for food in the United States is so bad that you can never have confidence in anything you eat, huh.

Also, don't assume what food I ingest. My confidence comes with the asterisk that I already know what to avoid. Though my limited food choice is more due to the fact that I'm a carnivore, so I only buy the best quality of raw meat I can find (and other unprocessed products of animal origin) and cook it myself.

In terms of food quality, I could only do better if I move to the countryside and raise my own livestock.

And before you say "But animal products also contain arsenic!", sure, but it's in even lower quantities than typical produce. At least in first world countries, where the regulations are strict.

Remember, it's not the presence of a substance that determines its danger, but how much of it you're exposed to.

What I mean by "Rat poison is never added stealthily to food, so I'm confident I'll never ingest it." is that I'm confident that the dose of any potentially harmful substance won't be high enough to be considered "poison".

The issue with soy is that since it's considered "mostly safe" by the regulatory bodies, there's no legal upper limit to how much a manufacturer can add.

And with potentially adverse effects from prolonged intake of soy being somewhat researched... The science isn't one-sided (since I know for a fact some of the studies claiming "soy is good for you" were funded by entities that are trying to promote soy, but that's another topic), but it's better to avoid it entirely just to be safe.
1) It doesn't have anything to do with the US. Arsenic is present in the environment because it was widely used across the globe as a pesticide as well as in other industrial applications like ore refining. It's in the soil and the ocean. It's everywhere and is reflected in literature by the WHO.

2) Inorganic arsenic is considered a Group 1 carcinogen by the WHO with numerous studies linking ingestion to increased risks of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, respiratory illness and various neurological abnormalities. On the other hand, the WHO has endorsed soy as a beneficial protein source with the caveat of moderation, research into isoflavones and concerns about its use in infant formula. However, besides in supplements, soy is considered safe by reputable, peer-reviewed research.

3) Soy is a traditional dietary staple of some of the longest-lived peoples on Earth. Arsenic is linked to populations with elevated instances of disease and mortality.

Given this, hypervigilance against soy while maintaining a cavalier attitude toward arsenic seems misplaced.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 13, 2019
Messages
316
That chapter cover ! 😳
Milk us really worthy of her name !
Looks like Weiss have a second mistress (waiting for "officialisation") considering how obsessed she's with her favorite "Punching bag" XD
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jul 20, 2023
Messages
96
"Scored the highest in history"
"Not breaking any record"
What the fuck is that guy smoking?
it was said the girl the year ahead of him set the record he tied with it so technically he didnt break the record since you cant break a perfect score performed ahead of you
For example say person A gets a 100 on a test so does person B who do you decide gets rank 1 at that point the answers simple the person that did it faster in this case a year faster
Its like perfect clear video game multiplayer leaderboards
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top