Tensei Kenja no Isekai Life: Daini no Shokugyou o Ete, Sekai Saikyou ni Narimashita - Vol. 24 Ch. 70.1

[popo53414]

She needs to stay in this body for the remaining of the series

 

[EchoGirl]

I agree, there's no prestige in being a B-rank salaryman

Yeah he was pretty burnt out to where he doesn't even show emotions here (other than when he had an amazing meal lol) tho he still probably has a reason to research the power and such too , maybe at the end of this he can 'retire' on a cushy vacation or just like, become a teacher for the future generations and take it easy or s o lol

Edit: my bad, it's been so long i forgot the reason why he wanted to go into the archives was to find info bout the secret organizations, not to 'go home' (although while an OP life is nice it'd prolly be ideal to be isekai'd into a world where there wouldn't be some cult trying to end the world unless he was able to just hide from it all and emerge like a decade later lol tho i did expect him to come across a 'goddess' at some point and say he was a chosen one b/c of how overworked he was in his pastl ife lol)

 

[BusWindow]

Holy shit that magic analysis spell is amazing. Yuuji's main detriment was that he didn't understand basically anything so all of his fights are a matter of trial and error. Maybe he'll be able to analyze dangers and properly counter them now.

 

[Romisterie]

In her time either it is sarcasm or afraid her fans will mob them. I mean , who say people are normal, have common sense and things like that in a conversation other than sarcasm. She is always surrounded by her fans and familiars so if she ask them they be pressured by the peanut gallery to agree.

Also possible they know of the her pranklike spells and might be wary of provoking the walking prank machine

 

[Aqua_Mizue]

Thanks for the chapter

 

[AquilaSilvestris]

"He learned magic from books so he doesn't know much about theory" ?
🤦‍♂️
Yeah ... either something got lost in translation or I'm gonna need some bigger facepalm emoji.

 

[himea27]

"He learned magic from books so he doesn't know much about theory" ?
🤦‍♂️
Yeah ... either something got lost in translation or I'm gonna need some bigger facepalm emoji.

If I'm not wrong, he used the slimes to instantly learn magic, he doesn't read them on his own.

 

[AMicrowave]

A spell to cause pollen allergies... This girl was evil incarnate.

at least she stated that she only used it on evil people that escaped judgement

 

[mangavorex]

at least she stated that she only used it on evil people that escaped judgement

The isekai version of Dexter

Thanks for the (half) chapter

 

[lupus_in_fabula]

The dragon: I'm SO done with these two...

 

[AnotherDuck]

at least she stated that she only used it on evil people that escaped judgement

But come on, there's righteous punishment, and there's sadistic vengeance.

 

[GreC_89]

RISE FROM YOUR GRAVE!!!

 

[jonsmth]

Learning magic from books doesn't teach you any magic theory? It's often how you learn theory in the first place...

You can learn how to drive without knowing how 4-stroke internal combustion engine and a clutch works. You can use a computer without knowing what logic gates are and that the CPU is made up of lots of it.

You how there are so many How-to draw books out there? They usually don't teach you human anatomy and how contours on the human body appear the way they do. Guitar tabs and musical scoresheets don't come with music theory either.

i don't think that a grimoire about a spell or a number of spells need to teach magic theory too if it was not necessary. Like, maybe all you need is to memorize and recite the spell.

 

[AnotherDuck]

You can learn how to drive without knowing how 4-stroke internal combustion engine and a clutch works. You can use a computer without knowing what logic gates are and that the CPU is made up of lots of it.

Your argument hinges on that the "theory" is several levels deeper than necessary for operation. Theory can be that if you press the gas pedal the engine goes faster.

But the problem here is that "I learned magic from books, so I don't know magic theory," is a faulty argument, since learning from books does in no way imply you don't learn theory.

 

[jonsmth]

Your argument hinges on that the "theory" is several levels deeper than necessary for operation. Theory can be that if you press the gas pedal the engine goes faster.

But the problem here is that "I learned magic from books, so I don't know magic theory," is a faulty argument, since learning from books does in no way imply you don't learn theory.

I had scoresheet and music theory as an example...

I also mentioned that he could have only memorized spells, and he didn't have to know the theory behind them.

Or are you just arguing against that excerpt deliberately leaving out the rest of the argument? You may as well be arguing with a strawman.

Besides, the thing about pressing on the gas pedal to go faster is so intuitive you could learn it by doing it. With magic, that's like how a fire spell makes things hot. The theory they are on about is exactly the depth that which lets someone know how to build cars and microchips.

"Do you know magic theory?"
"Yeah, I read books about fire magic."
"Can you read this magic circle?"
"I know that - it's a fire spell."
"Uh... it's a spell that gives you male pattern baldness."

 

[AnotherDuck]

Or are you just arguing against that excerpt deliberately leaving out the rest of the argument? You may as well be arguing with a strawman.


Besides, the thing about pressing on the gas pedal to go faster is so intuitive you could learn it by doing it.

I don't need to answer to every single example. I can just point out one thing and if that's true, my point stands. Which it does, even if it's intuitive. Though your other examples were bad as well. Do you want me to tell you why?

The theory they are on about is exactly the depth that which lets someone know how to build cars and microchips.

No. It's closer to learning why a mathematical formula is written the way it is rather than just memorizing what it looks like. And that's something a lot of math books include. Which, again, is my point: Learning something from a book is not an argument for not knowing the theory, since that implies you don't learn theory from books.

 

[jonsmth]

I don't need to answer to every single example. I can just point out one thing and if that's true, my point stands. Which it does, even if it's intuitive. Though your other examples were bad as well. Do you want me to tell you why?


No. It's closer to learning why a mathematical formula is written the way it is rather than just memorizing what it looks like. And that's something a lot of math books include. Which, again, is my point: Learning something from a book is not an argument for not knowing the theory, since that implies you don't learn theory from books.

You shouldn't be responding to each example in isolation. You would be arguing in bad faith as you seem to be doing already. My fault perhaps is that my rhetoric was not effective enough that hopefully, it's only going over your head.

How is it so difficult to believe that a book could contain a how-to-do without explaining why things work out the way it does? Clearly, the grimoires didn't teach Yuuji magic theory. They're very likely not like your gradeschool math textbooks. They're closer to cookbooks or a collection of recipes. Also, there are more advanced literature that assumes that the reader already has the background, so it won't have to teach them theory beyond the scope of what the literature is discussing, such as the very basics.

 

[AnotherDuck]

You shouldn't be responding to each example in isolation.

You complained that I didn't respond to the other examples. And I did respond as to why they don't actually matter, but that apparently went straight over your head.

You would be arguing in bad faith as you seem to be doing already.

Just because you don't understand it and try to steer it away from the actual problem doesn't make it bad faith. If anything, you steering it away is what's bad faith.

How is it so difficult to believe that a book could contain a how-to-do without explaining why things work out the way it does?

This is the part you don't understand. That doesn't matter. At all. The logic you use is faulty.

I can use the same logic to show how bad it is. Let's say he has a dog instead. And he says it's a pug, so it's black. Now, obviously, you can't conclude it's black because it's a pug, since they come in many other colours. But the "logic" you use is that since some pugs are black, it makes sense to make that assumption. Which is obviously not how logic works.

 

[TheProtectorOfPureHeartedGirls]

Reliol should be inside Maria for crying out loud!!!

Teal acting like a girl is irritating!

Anyway, MC finally gets to learn a wonderful spell called "analysis" or something, finally... Seriously.