sorry to death?? this asshole sent a minor who had been horrifically abused by his family until he broke and killed them to death? and I'm just supposed to nod along like that had any valid reasoning? this chapter was great but wtf?! and the professor is still being portrayed as a good, intelligent guy when that has to be the stupidest, most psychotic shit I have ever heard. how the fuck was this good acting advice?!?!
literally taking one psych course or hell just having basic empathy would make you understand what could have driven a child to murder??????
clearly this boy wasn't murdering fucking strangers for fun.
I had to pause while reading because it seemed absolutely insane that we were having this sentimental scene about some old lunatic who sentenced a teen(?) to death. We even hear the child was remorseful and glad to be sentence to death for it, so he wasn't mentally in a great place. Just bonkers that it was left as is, like we should have got some heartfelt meaning froma miscarriage of justice.
They're already doing a boatload of unrealistic nonsense, giving MC a golden path to success. They could've made the side-story anecdote include a "revolutionary" (possibly anachronistic) display of legal compassion.
Edit: circled back around, and I did misread it slightly. It wasn't played as "the right action". The quick switch from the 'anecdote' to 'set' made collision seem larger on my first pass. Because I'm a sore loser I will say that I would have added a more concrete thought from the professor than "I think about the look in his eye sometimes" when we, the audience, aren't given a visual to go off.