Tsumi to Batsu no Spica - Ch. 16 - Nameless Malice (5)

[Doed13]

Eeh i dont buy it
A murderer that murder prostitutes is a murderer
A "murderer" that murder murderers is a vigilante
especially if those murderers are fully capable of keep on murdering

Im not a lawer, but im pretty sure the diference from a killing to a murderer is some one's innocence

It's the intent.

Spica murder those murderer not to enact justice. If she want, she could frame the shit out of them and get them to jail easily. But no, she does murder like fixing a misbuttoning button on a cothes, aka, a satisfaction. She does this so she feels like cleaning a shit from a street.

Like this old man here. He already got dementia, couldn't remember shit. What spica did? Oh he should remember all what he did then i will kill him. She doesn't kill him right away. She is chasing that satisfaction, she is chasing that dominating the once used dominating person.

It's still under vigilantism act though. But just because it's vigilantism, it doesn't mean she ain't psychopath.

 

[babonjra]

I am disappointed at this sudden inner thought reveal, it's almost mundane this way. Prior to this chapter, Spica came off as almost a form of Death incarnate, and this spoils most of that vibe.

welp yeah was disappointed that all she needed is only one touch. so it goes

 

[EchoGirl]

It's the intent.

Spica murder those murderer not to enact justice. If she want, she could frame the shit out of them and get them to jail easily. But no, she does murder like fixing a misbuttoning button on a cothes, aka, a satisfaction. She does this so she feels like cleaning a shit from a street.

Like this old man here. He already got dementia, couldn't remember shit. What spica did? Oh he should remember all what he did then i will kill him. She doesn't kill him right away. She is chasing that satisfaction, she is chasing that dominating the once used dominating person.

It's still under vigilantism act though. But just because it's vigilantism, it doesn't mean she ain't psychopath.

yeah she's def got some issues that said, i wonder, if she's used her powers to be selfish otherwise bc i'd assume she'd need money and such if she did have to eventually move around/transfer schools, to supply her with stuff like a stab proof vest or poison or so versus just having a bit more 'strength' on top of her psychic powers

tho maybe that's more something in a bonus chapter of her reading tarot cards/reading fortunes on the street XD

 

[wallsg]

Eeh i dont buy it
A murderer that murder prostitutes is a murderer
A "murderer" that murder murderers is a vigilante
especially if those murderers are fully capable of keep on murdering

Im not a lawer, but im pretty sure the diference from a killing to a murderer is some one's innocence

Vigilantes are still murderers. That's not changed even if the people they kill deserve it.

The only legal killings by a civilian are spelled out in legal code and those are limited. Sometimes there are some surprising justifications though (see below). The State (the government) is allowed to execute only as a legally-proscribed punishment and only after due process.

Arizona code has a couple of sections that cover it.

13-405. Justification; use of deadly physical force

Spoiler: 13-405

A. A person is justified in threatening or using deadly physical force against another:

1. If such person would be justified in threatening or using physical force against the other under section 13-404, and

2. When and to the degree a reasonable person would believe that deadly physical force is immediately necessary to protect himself against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly physical force.

B. A person has no duty to retreat before threatening or using deadly physical force pursuant to this section if the person is in a place where the person may legally be and is not engaged in an unlawful act.

13-411. Justification; use of force in crime prevention; applicability

Spoiler: 13-411

A. A person is justified in threatening or using both physical force and deadly physical force against another if and to the extent the person reasonably believes that physical force or deadly physical force is immediately necessary to prevent the other's commission of arson of an occupied structure under section 13-1704, burglary in the second or first degree under section 13-1507 or 13-1508, kidnapping under section 13-1304, manslaughter under section 13-1103, second or first degree murder under section 13-1104 or 13-1105, sexual conduct with a minor under section 13-1405, sexual assault under section 13-1406, child molestation under section 13-1410, armed robbery under section 13-1904 or aggravated assault under section 13-1204, subsection A, paragraphs 1 and 2.

B. There is no duty to retreat before threatening or using physical force or deadly physical force justified by subsection A of this section.

C. A person is presumed to be acting reasonably for the purposes of this section if the person is acting to prevent what the person reasonably believes is the imminent or actual commission of any of the offenses listed in subsection A of this section.

D. This section includes the use or threatened use of physical force or deadly physical force in a person's home, residence, place of business, land the person owns or leases, conveyance of any kind, or any other place in this state where a person has a right to be.