U12 (Under 12)

[BakedBanana]

oh

 

[ReeeMam]

@cuddlestruggle ok? But how is fetishizing killing EVER depicted in a positive manner? You literaly said pedophiles were oppressed, and now you try and take that shit back? “Nooo i meant it was criiiinge haha” at least have the self respect to stand by your claim you fuckin pedo coward. You said it’s cringe to depict a group like that, but that is literally what pedos usually look like. Fat ugly bastards, that’s the general standard for pedos. Also I think you would hit it off with @balrogdemorgoth as he’s a fuckin pedo freak like you.

 

[Jaid_Diah]

Why oh why did I even read this piece of fuckery? I need some fluff, STAT!

 

[CuddleStruggle]

@hourofmoths I mentioned it in a reply, but if you read the main comment it starts with "This is so cringe.".

Can you give examples? The last time I read berserk was like 6+ years ago and the only thing that comes to mind is the torturer who tortured Griffith. And deformity of religious fanatics pseudo-apostles was specifically explained that they were gathered that way, and most other fanatics look like normal humans. Heck, even deformity of the main religious dude was explained - he was doing prayers way too seriously and slamming his face to the floor when bowing to god. The only group that are all portrayed as deformed monster are the apostles. But they don't represent any real-life group, and pretty much anyone can become one if fate chooses them - be it a little girl from dysfunctional family, corrupt politician or a warrior searching for battle.

"talked so much"
1 comment and a few replies to replies directed to that comment.

" and how quick"
My first comment in this thread was 28 days ago, the comment about cringe was 10 days ago. 18 days is how quick it was.

"You seem to IDENTIFY with a CHILD RAPIST"
So? People use Alucard as profile picture - a murderer of humans and a monster.

"Your name "CuddleStruggle" obviously alludes to rape."
Raep is always the answer. Even if nobody asks any questions.

"I wouldn't let go anywhere near children"
I am working as a teacher in elementary school.

 

[CuddleStruggle]

@ReeeMam For example, a criminal life-style in GTA is depicted as fun and engaging. It depicted as cool to do a mad-max style car chase in the city, putting every pedestrian in a mortal danger from stray bullets and getting mowed down by cars. I remember there was even mission in GTA2 where you have to kidnap innocent people to literally turn them into hotdogs (because mafia was short on meat), so they tried to depict killing innocent people as something clever and funny.

My comment literally starts with "This is so cringe.". There is no need to imply things that are stated directly.

Btw, if you want to know how pedos look just look at portraits of your ancestors of 18 and earlier centuries, before feminist groups raised age of consent. Especially if your ancestors are from Delaware (it had 7yo age of consent).

 

[ReeeMam]

@CuddleStruggle killing imaginary npcs isn’t hurting real people, and you are not jacking off to running over pedestrians dumbass, the reason the sexualization of children in any medium is wrong is because you are fucking jacking off to C H I L D R E N. You don’t jack off to running over pedestrians. Although if you do maybe you could be grouped with the sick fucks who think euphoria was hot.

 

[CuddleStruggle]

@ReeeMam "You don’t jack off to running over pedestrians." - some people actually do jack off to it. Heck, there are even people who masturbate to trees. So, by the same logic it should be very wrong to have such depictions, because someone out there might actually jack off to it. Masturbation after all is a very evil act. That is why good christian parents tie hands of their kids or force them to wear chastity belts.

 

[CuddleStruggle]

Here is an example of something that I would jack off to unironically: commies that is being thrown out of a helicopter on a mass scale.

 

[ReeeMam]

@Cuddlestruggle lmaooo “hypothetically let us say that people did, in fact jack off to pedestrians, which they do, this means you should, hypothetically, remove said thing so that, hypothetically people don’t jack off to it, so by this logic, jacking off to children isn’t in fact wrong, that means that if you bad my tan lines gyaru rape ugly bastard loli ntr Bukake hentai you must also remove gta” dude people jack off to anything, both are morally reprehensible but running over pedestrians and jacking off wasn’t the gta devs intention. loli porn however is. It was made for that.

 

[CuddleStruggle]

@ReeeMam how do you even define what it was made for? By author intent? If yes, then author can simply tell that it was made for educational purpose, like to help study erotic culture of Japan or something (yes, it is possible to do academic studies even on sexual stuff). By consumer own judgement? Well, the person who jacks off to pedestrian being mowed have judged it to be fap-worthy material, so therefore the product itself is clearly moraly reprehensible because according to his judgement it was made for fapping to people getting killed.

 

[ReeeMam]

@Cuddlestruggle yes, i am shaving my balls with this scalpel, this is what it was made for. Mmmm that was a good nut furbys were clearly made for fucking. Holy shit bro you must have one brain cell that bounces around in your fucking head like a screensaver.

 

[CuddleStruggle]

@ReeeMam I love how you switched your examples to physical objects, because your probably understood that assigning intent to art in any objective way is an impossible task.

 

[ItchyLongThing]

@CuddleStruggle @Reeemam can you guys like, do this conversation somewhere else


P.S Pedophilia is fucking disgusting

 

[ReeeMam]

@Cuddlestruggle can we cut our losses? Last time I did this I got muted, for having the same argument we are having right now. Also calling loli hentai art lmaooooo.

 

[greatninja3]

@ReeeMam Yeah killing imaginary NPC doesn’t kill or hurt people

But isn’t that the same logic with fapping to imaginary loli drawings I mean just saying you are also not raping or hurting people.

I for one fap to anything with few exceptions as long as it’s a drawing even scat hentai is very hot for me, after she shits they do anal sex that shit is good tbh watching 2 girls 1 cup though made me vomit in fact I don’t particularly like anal porn maybe because it’s very unhygienic to actually shit then do anal sex 2D always better than 3D.

 

[ReeeMam]

@greatninja3 “even scat hentai is even hot for me” “fap to anything” ok now I’m considering whether you are worse than people who beat it to loli hentai. And btw, sure you are not hurting anyone but beating your dick to children isn’t morally ok.

 

[greatninja3]

@ReeeMam some artist just draw them well i ain’t a furry but if it’s made by mizone his works makes me slightly furry.

 

[CuddleStruggle]

@ReeeMam morality makes no sense when your actions have no effect on other living beings. As a hypothetical example: If you were the only living creature on this planet it would be impossible to do something that is immoral. And even religious morality with rules that have no effect on other people (like not allowing certain heretical thoughts in your head) only makes sense if there is a god (a living being), so you follow them to have good relationship with a god, because god supposedly is aware of what you think.

 

[ReeeMam]

@cuddlestruggle as Confucius probably said, morals and rules are what separate men from @cuddlestruggle and @greatninja3

 

[CuddleStruggle]

@ReeeMam I wonder how old was Confucius wife when he married her, considering the child marriages practiced in ancient China. He kinda looks like Men of Culture and would visually fit to this manga - https://en.24smi.org/public/media/2019/11/13/02-m9m7g1v.jpg